Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 22;117(1):112–116. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11696

Table 1.

Effect of CPF exposure on PRL expression in male and female mice.

Treatment Males Females
M0P0 30.43 ± 0.32 29.73 ± 5.84
M0P1 28.01 ± 2.63 34.49 ± 3.07
M0P3 31.10 ± 1.34 30.51 ± 3.39
M3P0 29.16 ± 1.00 37.93 ± 6.83
M3P1 27.39 ± 0.82 35.17 ± 2.16
M3P3 33.47 ± 2.58 35.91 ± 0.49
M6P0 34.99 ± 3.76 31.62 ± 1.90
M6P1 33.14 ± 4.45 29.77 ± 3.84
M6P3 28.84 ± 2.41 32.64 ± 2.43

Values are optical density × mm2 levels ± SE as determined by electrophoresis gel densitometry. ANOVA did not reveal any significant difference among CPF treatment groups.