Table 4.
Baseline blood lead level | No. (calcium/placebo) | β-Coefficient | %Δb | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Among all women with follow-up (intent-to-treat analysis) | ||||
< 5 μg/dL | 349 (183/166) | −0.07 | −7% | 0.08 |
≥ 5 μg/dL | 208 (100/108) | −0.19 | −17% | 0.003 |
Among those women with compliance ≥ 50%c (as-treated analysis, among high compliers) | ||||
< 5 μg/dL | 292 (162/130) | −0.15 | −14% | 0.01 |
≥5 μg/dL | 183 (87/96) | −0.19 | −17% | 0.004 |
Among those women with compliance < 50%c (as-treated analysis, among low compliers) | ||||
< 5 μg/dL | 57 (21/36) | 0.29 | 34% | 0.02 |
≥5 μg/dL | 25 (13/12) | −0.18 | −17% | 0.49 |
Adjusting for baseline blood lead level (log-transformed), maternal age, dietary calcium intake at baseline, daily energy intake at baseline, treatment group, and trimester of pregnancy.
Percent change; log-transformed outcome variable, thus estimate of treatment effect: 1 − e−β.
We assessed compliance by pill count at each visit and analyzed as proportion of expected pills used between baseline (first trimester) and end of follow-up (8 months’ gestation).