Table II.
Model | |||
---|---|---|---|
Granulate | Tablets | ||
Compound | Correlation coefficient | ||
Selectivity | Enantyum granulated | >0.99 | – |
Coated tablets | – | 1 | |
Uncoated tables | – | 0.99 | |
Maize starch | 0.75 | 0.76 | |
Microcrystalline cellulose | 0.90 | 0.86 | |
Carboxymethyl starch | 0.79 | 0.70 | |
Dexketoprofen | 0.31 | 0.30 | |
Glycerol palmitoestearate | 0.24 | 0.33 | |
Parameter | Results | ||
Linearity | n | 20 | 8 |
Concentration range (mg/g) | 75.6–120.6 | 74.1 – 112.5 | |
Intercept | −0.02 ± 4.54 | 3.9 ± 10.6 | |
Slope | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 0.96 ± 0.12 | |
R | 0.995 | 0.993 | |
Accuracy | n | 10 | 10 |
Avg. difference (mg/g) | −0.33 | 0.17 | |
SD | 1.87 | 1.00 | |
t exp | 1.11 | 0.54 | |
t crit | 2.23 | 2.26 | |
Repeatability | Replicates | 6 | 6 |
Mean NIR (mg/g) | 94.64 | 91.22 | |
CV (%) | 0.39 | 0.21 | |
Intermediate | Days (3) | F exp 13.7 | F exp 0.66 |
F tab 19.00 | F tab 19.00 | ||
Precision | Analysts (2) | F exp 0.07 | F exp 0.09 |
F tab 18.51 | F tab 18.51 | ||
CV (%) | 0.72 | 1.17 | |
Robustness | n | 20 | 14 |
t exp | 0.56 | 0.41 | |
t crit | 2.09 | 2.16 |