Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 27;3(1):e365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000365

Table 3. Polymorphism summaries.

Sample ni ns S π θ DT FS R2
Barra de Guaratiba 24 24 0 0 - 0 - - - -
Estrela 1S 15 22 33 0.0225 (0.000025) 0.0343 (0.000158) −1.4748 −2.0760 0.0888
Estrela 2S 21 30 30 0.0187 (0.000009) 0.0286 (0.000101) −1.3976 −6.7757 0.0724
Jaíba 1S 10 17 20 0.0221 (0.000003) 0.0222 (0.000082) −0.2059 −7.7875 0.1216
Jaíba 2S 10 15 18 0.0178 (0.000005) 0.0208 (0.000077) −0.5816 −3.5445 0.1058
Marajó 4 5 12 0.0196 (0.000044) 0.0217 (0.000145) −0.7031 2.3849 0.2102
Mesquita* 3 4 4 0.0088 (0.000008) 0.0082 (0.000031) - - -
Pancas 24 27 20 0.0134 (0.000003) 0.0195 (0.000054) −0.5378 −9.2388 0.0792
Teresina 17 18 14 0.0137 (0.000004) 0.0153 (0.000043) −0.4034 −4.8773 0.1177

ni, number of individuals and ns, number of DNA sequences of the samples (see Methods for further details); S number of polymorphic sites; π, average number of pair-wise differences; θ, neutral parameter, based on the number of segregating sites. Variances of π and θ values are shown in brackets. DT, Tajima's D [54]; FS, Fu's FS [55] and R2, Ramos-Onsins and Rozas' R2 [56]. *The Mesquita sequences were derived from the F1 of a single female and therefore no tests were carried out with this sample.