Abstract
Although the prion protein is abundantly expressed in the CNS, its biological functions remain unclear. To determine the endogenous function of the cellular prion protein (PrPc), we compared the effects of oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress inducers on apoptotic signaling in PrPc-expressing and PrPko-knockout neural cells. H2O2, brefeldin-A (BFA) and tunicamycin (TUN) induced increases in caspase-9 and caspase-3, PKCδ proteolytic activation, and DNA fragmentation in PrPc and PrPko cells. Interestingly, ER stress-induced activation of caspases, PKCδ, and apoptosis were significantly exacerbated in PrPc cells, whereas H2O2-induced proapoptotic changes were suppressed in PrPc compared to PrPko cells. Additionally, caspases-12 and -8 were activated only in BFA and TUN treatments. Inhibitors of caspase-9, caspase-3, and PKCδ significantly blocked H2O2-, BFA- and TUN-induced apoptosis, whereas the caspase-8 inhibitor attenuated only BFA- and TUN-induced cell death, and the antioxidant MnTBAP blocked only H2O2-induced apoptosis. Overexpression of the kinase inactive PKCδK376R or the cleavage site-resistant PKCδD327A mutants suppressed both ER- and oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Thus, PrPc plays a proapoptotic role during ER stress, and an anti-apoptotic role during oxidative stress-induced cell death. Together, these results suggest that cellular PrPc enhances the susceptibility of neural cells to impairment of protein processing and trafficking, but decreases the vulnerability to oxidative insults, and that PKCδ is a key downstream mediator of cellular stress-induced neuronal apoptosis.
Keywords: Caspases, Protein kinase C, transgenic, protein misfolding, neurodegeneration, prion diseases
Introduction
Prion-related diseases are infectious diseases often called transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), that affect many mammalian hosts [1–7]. Prion diseases include Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, scrapie in sheep, and chronic wasting disease (CWD) in deer and elk, transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) in minks, and they all share considerable neuropathological and clinical similarities [1–7]. Prion diseases cause severe neuronal damage mainly in the brain regions that control motor function, including the basal ganglia, cerebral cortex, thalamus, and cerebellum. Neuronal damage is accompanied by the accumulation of the abnormal prion protein PrPsc (scrapie isoform), derived from the post-translational conformational change of normal prion protein PrPc (cellular isoform) through unknown pathogenic mechanisms. The abnormally folded isoform PrPsc is partially resistant to proteinase K digestion and appears to be the infectious proteinaceous particle [8, 9]. Therefore, prion diseases are transmissible and threatening to both humans and animals.
Apoptosis is the major type of cell death observed in several neurodegenerative disorders, including prion diseases, and is characterized by a series of distinct morphological and biochemical changes caused by activation of an array of cell signaling molecules in the cell [10, 11]. Apoptotic cell death pathways can be triggered by either an extrinsic factors pathway triggered by cell death receptors such as Fas, and mediated by caspase-8 or caspase-10, or by an intrinsic pathway dependent on oxidative stress, mitochondrial release of cytochrome C, caspase-9, and caspase-3 [12–14]. More recently, apoptosis was also shown to be triggered by ER stress which proceeds via an alternative intrinsic pathway that is dependent on caspase-12 and caspase-8 [15–18].
Oxidative damage and apoptosis have been well documented in animal and human prion diseases [19–21]. Evidence indicates that the cellular antioxidant capacity is significantly compromised in cells lacking PrPc, and that PrPko cells are more sensitive to oxidative stress than control cells [22–27]. Studies have also shown PrPsc and the toxic fragment PrP106-126 induces apoptosis in a variety of neuronal cells via Bcl2/Bax dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS generation, cytochrome C release, caspase-3, and p38 MAP kinase activation [28–33]. Recently, Hetz et al. demonstrated that caspase-12 and ER stress mediate PrPsc-induced apoptotic cell death in mouse Neuro2A cells [34]. Studies have also shown that normal host prion protein is necessary for scrapie-induced neurotoxicity, as evidenced by PrPc-deficient mice unable to develop the disease when infected with scrapie isoform PrPsc [35], and depletion of cellular PrPc during ongoing prion infection prevents the neurodegeneration and pathology associated with the disease [36]. Thus, PrPc seems to be fundamental to the neurotoxicity observed during PrPsc infections [37–39]. Cross-linking PrPc in vivo with specific monoclonal antibodies was recently shown to trigger neuronal apoptosis, suggesting that PrPc functions in the control of neuronal survival [40]. However, the cellular mechanisms by which PrPc is converted to PrPsc to cause rapid and severe neuronal damage in prion diseases are poorly understood.
Therefore, characterization of neurobiological functions of PrPc will assist in elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms underlying prion diseases. To more fully understand the biological role of PrPc, a stable neural cell line derived from PrP knockout mice was compared to PrP knockout cells that had been engineered to express mouse PrPc. In this study, we used these two cell lines to evaluate the contribution of cellular non-pathogenic PrPc to oxidative and ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death mechanisms. Herein, we report that cellular PrPc enhances the susceptibility of neural cells to ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death and protects against vulnerability to oxidative insults, and that PKCδ is a key downstream mediator of cellular stress-induced neuronal apoptosis.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), Brefeldin A (BFA), Tunicamycin (TUN), cyclosporine A, β-actin (mouse monoclonal), histone H1, β-glycerophosphate, ATP, and protein-A-sepharose were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); rottlerin was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Z-VAD-FMK, (Z-Val-Ala-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone), Z-DEVD-FMK (Z-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone), Z-IETD-FMK (Z-Ile-Glu-Thr-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone), Z-LEHD-FMK (Z-Leu-Glu-His-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone), Ac-DEVD-AFC (Acetyl Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-AFC), Ac-IETD-AFC (Acetyl Ile-Glu-Thr-Asp-AFC), and Ac-LEHD-AFC (Acetyl-Leu-Glu-His-Asp-AFC) were obtained from MP Biomedicals (Irvine, CA). Antibodies to PKCδ and PKCα were purchased from Santacruz labs (Santacruz, CA), and 3F4 monoclonal antibody was purchased from Signet Labs (Dedham, MA). Antibody for SAF32 was obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). ECL chemiluminescence kit was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ). Hydroethidine was purchased from Molecular Probes Inc. (Eugene, OR). Cell Death Detection Elisa Plus Assay Kit was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN). Mn(III)tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)porphyrin chloride (MnTBAP) was purchased from Oxis Health Products (Portland, Oregon). [γ-32P]ATP was purchased from Perkin Elmer (Downers Grove, IL). Bradford protein assay kit was purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). Lipofectamine Plus reagent, RPMI, horse serum, fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin, and PCEP4 plasmid were purchased from Invitrogen (Gaithersburg, MD). Plasmids for kinase-inactive dominant negative mutant PKCδK376-GFP fusion protein and pEGFP-N1 were kind gifts from Dr. Stuart Yuspa, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Plasmids for caspase cleavage-resistant PKCδ mutant PKCδD327A-GFP fusion protein were kindly provided by Dr. Mary E. Reyland, University of Colorado (Boulder, CO).
Generation of the brain-derived PrP0/0 cell line CF10
Immortalization of PrP0/0 cells was done using the plasmid vector pSV3-neo and cells were derived from 129/Ola mice with an inactivated PrP gene accomplished via gene targeting. CF10 cell line lacking the cellular prion protein was generated from the brain of E15 mouse pups (Unpublished observations Vorberg and Priola).
PrPc and PrPko cells
PrPc cells express mouse prion protein with a hamster 3F4-epitope and PrPko cells were derived from prion knockout mice (Priola et al., 2001; Takemura et al., 2006). PrPc mouse neural cell line was derived from CF10 mouse neural cell line lacking prion protein engineered to stably express the mouse PrPc gene with 3F4 hamster epitope. As a non-PrP control, PrP-knockout cells expressing the empty vector PrPko were also established. Mouse PrPc and PrPko neural cell lines (kindly provided by Dr. Suzette A Priola, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, NIH, Hamilton, Montana) were grown in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 units penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin. Cell cultures were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C for 4–5 days and then used for experiments.
Treatment paradigm
After 2–4 days in culture, PrPc and PrPko cells were exposed to 10–100 μM H2O2, 3–30 μM BFA, or 0.6–6 μM TUN over a 24 h time. In inhibitor studies, MnTBAP (ROS inhibitor, 2 μM), rottlerin (PKCδ inhibitor, 2 μM), cyclosporine A (mitochondrial permeability pore inhibitor, 1 μM), Z-VAD-FMK (pan-caspase inhibitor, 100 μM), Z-DEVD-FMK (caspase-3-specific inhibitor, 100 μM), Z-LEHD-FMK (caspase-9-specific inhibitor, 100 μM), or Z-IETD-FMK (caspase-8-specific inhibitor, 100 μM) were added at the same time as H2O2, BFA, and TUN. After treatment, cells were harvested at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h and were assessed for caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-12, and proteolytic activation of PKCδ and DNA fragmentation. DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide, 0.1%) and ethanol (0.1%) were used as vehicles in control experiments.
Transient transfections
Transient transfection assays were performed as described previously and according to the manufacturer’s protocol supplied with the Cell Line Nucleofector™ Kit V [41]. Briefly, after 2–3 days in culture, PrPc cells were harvested, washed with 1X PBS, and resuspended in transfection solution (supplied with the kit) at a cell density of 2x106 cells/100 μl. Plasmids encoding pPKCδK376R-GFP, pPKCδD327A-GFP, and pEGFP-N1 DNA were added separately to 100 μl of cell suspension, transferred into a nucleofector cuvette, and electroporated using the Nucleofector device. Cells were immediately transferred from the cuvette to 24-well plates after dilution with growth media. After 24 h, GFP-expressing cells were observed under a TE2000 Nikon fluorescence microscope and the transfection efficiency was estimated to be between 70–75%. At this point, cells were harvested and used for apoptosis assays.
Immunocytochemistry
After PrPc and PrPko cells were established, they were assessed for PrPc expression using monoclonal antibody directed against 3F4 epitope. Cells were plated on poly-l-lysine (0.1 mg/ml) coated coverslips. After 12–24 h, the cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. The cells were then incubated with antibodies directed against the 3F4 epitope (3F4 mouse monoclonal 1:250) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with the mouse Alexa-488 conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson Laboratories, 1:1000) for 90 min at room temperature; cells were then washed with 1X PBS, mounted on slides, viewed, and images were captured using a Nikon C1 confocal microscope.
Cytotoxicity assays
Cytotoxicity assays were performed as described previously [41]. PrPc and PrPko cells were exposed to 30 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN for 24 h. Cell death was determined by the trypan blue exclusion method with an Improved Nebauer-type Hemacytometer. The cell viability was normalized as percent of control. Cell death was also determined using the Sytox green fluorescence-based nucleic acid probe after exposing PrPc cells to 30 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN for 24 h in the presence or absence of 100 μM Z-VAD-FMK. Sytox green is a cell-impermeable nucleic acid dye that enters dead cells and intercalates with DNA to produce green fluorescence, which was quantified using a fluorescence microplate reader (SpectraMax Gemini XS Model, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) with excitation at 485 nm and emission at 538 nm [41].
Flow cytometric measurement of ROS generation
ROS generation was detected in the cells using hydroethidine with a Becton Dickenson FACScan™ flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Francisco, CA) as described previously [42]. Flow cytometric data were analyzed by Cellquest™ data analysis software. PrPc and PrPko cells were resuspended with Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) with 2 mM calcium at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/ml. Cells were then incubated with 10 μM hydroethidine for 15 min at 37°C in the dark to allow dye loading into the cells. After incubation with dye, excess dye was removed, and the cells were resuspended with HBSS. Following addition of 100 μM H2O2, 30 μM BFA, or 6 μM TUN, ROS generation was measured at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min post-exposure in the fluorescence-activated cell sorter in the flow cytometer.
Enzymatic assay for caspases
Caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 activity analyses were performed as previously described [42]. After treatment cells briefly were spun and the cell pellets were lysed with Tris buffer (pH 7.4, 50 mM Tris HCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM EGTA) containing 10 μM digitonin for 20 min at 37°C. Lysates were centrifuged at 900 × g for 3 min, and the resulting supernatants were incubated with specific fluorogenic caspase substrates at 37°C for 1 h. Ac-DEVD-AFC (50 μM), Ac-IETD-AFC (50 μM) and Ac-LEHD-AFC (50 μM) were used as substrates for determining caspase-3-, caspase-8-, and caspase-9-like protease activities, respectively. Levels of cleaved (active) caspase substrate were monitored at excitation λ 400 nm and emission λ 505 nm using a fluorescence microplate reader (SpectraMax Gemini XS Model, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Caspase activities were expressed as fluorescence units per mg protein per h. The protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit.
Western blots
After exposure of PrPc and PrPko cells (~1 × 107 cells) to 100 μM H2O2, 10–30 μM BFA, or 2–6 μM TUN with or without pharmacological inhibitors over 12 h, cell lysates were prepared as described previously [42]. Briefly, PrPc and PrPko cells were washed with 1X phosphate buffered saline (PBS), resuspended in homogenization buffer, and then sonicated for 10–15 sec. The homogenates from treated and control cells were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 60 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were collected as cell lysates. Cell lysates containing equal amounts of protein were loaded in each lane, resolved on a 10–12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories). After blocking the non-specific binding sites with non-fat dry milk (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), the membranes were then treated with either anti-3F4-PrPc (1:500 mouse monoclonal), or SAF-32 monoclonal antibody (1:500) for detecting mouse prion, anti-procaspase-12 (1:1000, rabbit polyclonal), anti-PKCδ (1:2000, rabbit polyclonal), or anti-PKCα (1:1000 rabbit polyclonal) antibodies, followed by secondary HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (1:2000) or anti-mouse (1:2000) antibody. Antibody-bound proteins were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system using a Kodak Imager (Kodak Image Station 2000R, Eastman Kodak Company, New Haven, CT). To confirm equal protein in each lane, membranes were reprobed with β-actin (1:5000 mouse monoclonal).
Immunoprecipitation kinase assays
PKCδ enzymatic activity was determined using an in vitro immunoprecipitation kinase assay as previously described [42]. Briefly, PrPc and PrPko cells were exposed to 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN for 12 h, with or without a caspase-3 inhibitor (100 μM Z-DEVD-FMK), and cell lysates were collected. After immunoprecipitation with anti-PKCδ antibody, 25-μl samples containing PKCδ bound to sepharose A beads were incubated with 25 μl of reaction buffer containing 0.4 mg histone H1 and 5 μCi of [γ-32P] ATP (4,500 Ci/mM) for 10 min at 30°C. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 2X SDS gel loading buffer and boiled for 5 min. The samples were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE and histone phosphorylated bands were detected using a Phospho Imager (Personal Molecular Imager FX, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and quantified using Quantity One 4.2.0 Software (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
DNA fragmentation assay
DNA fragmentation was measured using a Cell Death Detection ELISA Plus Assay Kit, as described previously [42]. Briefly, PrPc and PrPko cells were exposed to 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN in the presence or absence of pharmacological inhibitors for 24 h. After treatment, cells were spun down, washed with 1X PBS, and incubated with cell lysis buffer (supplied with the kit) for 30 min at RT, and then centrifuged. The supernatants were then dispensed onto streptavidin-coated 96-well microtiter plates containing 80 μl of HRP-conjugated antibody cocktail. After 2 h incubation at RT, the nucleosomes retained by the antibody cocktail in the immunocomplex were quantified spectrophotometrically with ABTS as an HRP substrate. Measurements were made at 405 nm and 490 nm using a SpectroMax 190 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The difference of absorbance between OD 405 and OD 490 nm was used to quantify the levels of DNA fragmentation.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data from caspase enzymatic activities and DNA fragmentation assays were first analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Neuman-Keuls or Dunnett’s post-tests were then performed to compare between untreated, H2O2-, BFA- and TUN-treated, and inhibitor-cotreated groups; differences with p<0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Characterization of PrPc-expressing cell lines
First, we characterized the level of prion protein expression in PrPc cells and PrPko cells. Stable expression of PrPc was verified using 3F4 monoclonal antibody raised by immunocytochemical analysis. A bright immunofluorescence staining on the cell surface was observed in PrPc cells, with a very weak staining in the cytoplasm or the nucleus (Fig 1A), indicating that PrPc expression was predominantly localized in the plasma membrane. No staining was observed in PrPko cells. PrPc expression was confirmed with Western blot analysis using two antibodies directed against two different epitopes in the mouse prion protein. 3F4-antibody detects the hamster epitope present in the exogenously expressed prion protein, whereas SAF32 antibody can detect both endogenous and expressed mouse prion protein. Since, PrPko cells were derived from prion knockout mice, we used SAF32- antibody to confirm that PrPko cells do not express the endogenous prion protein. Figure 1B shows stable expression of PrPc protein in PrPc cell lysates, but not in PrPko cell lysates with both 3F4- and SAF32-antibodies. Nitrocellulose membranes were reprobed with β-actin antibody and the thickness of the 43 kDa β-actin band was identical in all lanes, confirming equal protein loading. As shown in Fig. 1B, PrPc cells were positive for mouse prion protein, while PrPko cells were negative for both SAF32 and 3F4-antibody staining. Western blots revealed similar prion protein expression, di-glycosylated (32–34 kDa), mono-glycosylated (24–28 kDa), and unglycosylated (17–20 kDa) with both SAF32 and 3F4 antibody staining (Fig. 1B), indicating that the PrPc protein is synthesized and processed normally.
Fig. 1.
Effect of H2O2, BFA, and TUN on PrPc protein expression. (A) Confocal images depicting stable expression of mouse PrPc in PrPko neural cells using 3F4-antibody. A bright immunofluorescence with cell surface staining pattern was observed in PrPc cells, with no or very weak staining in the cytoplasm or the nucleus, indicating that PrPc was expressed predominantly in the cell surface. No staining was observed in PrPko cells. (B) Western blot showing stable expression of PrPc protein in PrPc and PrPko cell lysates. (C) Western blot showing the effect of 100 μM H2O2, 30 μM BFA, or 6 μM TUN on PrPc expression following 24 h treatment. Membranes were reprobed with β-actin antibody to confirm equal protein loading in each lane.
Effect of H202, BFA, and TUN on PrPc expression
We examined the effects of H2O2 (oxidative stress inducer), BFA (inhibitor of protein transport from the ER to Golgi), and TUN (N-glycosylation inhibitor) on PrPc expression. Figure 1C shows the effect of 100 μM H2O2, 30 μM BFA, and 6 μM TUN on PrPc expression. Antibody directed against the prion 3F4-epitope was used to determine the expression pattern. Untreated PrPC cells expressed all three forms of prion protein: unglycosylated (17–20kDa), mono-N-glycosylated (24–28kDa) and di-N-glycosylated (32–34kDa). The pattern of expression in H2O2 was similar to that in untreated cells. As expected in the presence of N-glycosylation inhibitor (TUN), PrPC cells expressed only the unglycosylated form. On the other hand, BFA-treated cells expressed mostly mono-N-glycosylated and unglycosylated forms and significantly reduced di-N-glycosylated form compared to untreated PrPc cells. Nitrocellulose membranes were reprobed with β-actin antibody to confirm equal protein loading.
Caspases mediate oxidative stress- and ER stress-induced cytotoxic cell death
To determine the effect of oxidative stress- and ER stress-inducers on cytotoxic cell death, we compared the relative cytotoxic response of H2O2, BFA, and TUN treatment in PrPc cells. Figure 2A shows that 24-h treatment with 30 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN decreased the cell viability by 70%, 85%, and 77%, respectively, compared to the untreated control PrPc cells, using the trypan blue cell death assay. There was no significant loss of cell viability in H2O2-, BFA-, or TUN-treated cells up to 6 h (data not shown). To determine if caspases mediate cytotoxic cell death, cells were co-treated with 100 μM Z-VAD-FMK (pan caspase inhibitor) for 24 h, and cell death was quantified by Sytox green fluorescence assay. Exposure to 30 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN for 24 h increased cytotoxic cell death by 150%, 236%, and 200% respectively, compared to untreated control cells (control values are normalized to 100%). Co-treatment with 100 μM Z-VAD-FMK (pan-caspase inhibitor) almost completely attenuated H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced cytotoxicity (Fig. 2B). These results suggest caspases mediate both oxidative and ER stress-induced cytotoxic cell death.
Fig. 2.
Effect of PrPc on H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced cytotoxic cell death and ROS generation. (A) Trypan blue assay: PrPc-expressing neural cells were treated with 30 μM H2O2, 30 μM BFA, or 6 μM TUN, and cell viability was determined using the trypan blue exclusion technique by counting live (clear) and dead (stained) cells in three to five randomly selected fields. (B) Sytox assay: PrPc cells were treated with 100 μM H2O2, 30 μM BFA, or 6 μM TUN ± 100 μM Z-VAD-FMK for 24 h, and the number of Sytox-positive cells was determined using the SYTOX® Green nucleic acid stain assay, as described in the Materials and Methods section. (C) ROS generation was measured in PrPc and PrPko cells treated with 100 μM H2O2, 30 μM BFA, or 6 μM TUN, and hydroethidine fluorescence intensity was measured at 45 min by flow cytometry. Data represent mean ± SEM, N = 6, from two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Asterisks (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01) indicate significant differences between control and treatment groups. Pound sign (#p<0.05 and ##p<0.01) indicates significant differences between treated and Z-VAD-FMK-treated cells or H2O2-treated PrPc and PrPko cells.
H2O2-induced ROS generation is diminished in PrPc-expressing cells
Flow cytometric analysis using the ROS-sensitive fluorescence probe hydroethidine revealed that H2O2 treatment induced time-dependent increases in ROS generation, whereas exposure to BFA and TUN did not induce significant increases in ROS generation. As shown in Fig. 2C, exposure to 100 μM H2O2 for 45 min resulted in 188% and 232% increases in ROS production in PrPc and PrPko cells, respectively, whereas 30 μM BFA- and 6 μM TUN-treatment only slightly (118% and 117% of control) increased ROS generation when compared to untreated PrPc cells in the same time period. Since PrPc cells were more sensitive to BFA and TUN, we measured ROS generation in PrPc cells only. Overall, these results suggest that oxidative stress, but not ER stress, generates a significant amount of ROS in PrPc and PrPko cells. Additionally, PrPc expression partially protected against H2O2-induced increases in ROS generation.
PrPc exacerbates ER stress, but protects against oxidative stress-induced increases in caspase-9, caspase-8, and caspase-3 activation
Previous studies have implicated multiple caspases, including caspase-9, caspase-3, and caspase-12, in mediating various stress-induced apoptotic cell death [12, 13, 15, 17]. Therefore, we examined the activation of various caspases, including caspase-9, caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-12, over a 12 h period with H2O2, BFA, or TUN. Initial time-course analysis revealed BFA and TUN induced maximal increases in caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3 enzyme activities. Increases were observed at 3, 6, and 12 h in both PrPc and PrPko cells, suggesting a sequential activation of caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3. As shown in Fig. 3, BFA- and TUN-induced increases in caspase-9 (Fig. 3A), caspase-3 (Fig. 3B), and caspase-8 (Fig. 3C) were significantly augmented in PrPc cells, whereas H2O2-induced caspase-9 and -3 were significantly attenuated in PrPc cells compared to PrPko cells. H2O2-treatment did not induce any significant changes in caspase-8 activity in PrPc and PrPko cells. Together, these results suggest that PrPc partially protects against H2O2-induced increases, but exacerbates BFA- and TUN-induced increases in caspase activities.
Fig. 3.
Effect of PrPc on H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced caspase activations. (A) Caspase-9, (B) Caspase-3 and (C) Caspase-8. PrPc and PrPko cells were treated with 100 μM H2O2, 30 μM BFA, or 6 μM TUN over a period of 12 h. Cytosolic extracts were collected and assayed for caspase-3 (12 h), caspase-9 (6 h), and caspase-8 (3 h) activities using the enzyme-specific fluorogenic substrate as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data represent the mean ± SEM, N = 6, from two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Asterisks (*p<0.05) and (**p<0.01) represent significant differences between treated and respective untreated cells.
Activation of caspase-12 in BFA- and TUN-treated, but not in H2O2-treated, PrPc cells
Caspase-12 has been reported to be activated during ER stress [16, 17, 34, 43]. Activation of this caspase normally occurs in the ER and results from the proteolytic conversion of procaspase-12 (50 kDa) to activated caspase-12 (20 and 30 kDa), which is then translocated to the cytoplasm. In the cytoplasm, caspase-12 has been shown to directly activate caspase-8 and caspase-3 [18]. Therefore, we examined if caspase-12 is activated during treatment with BFA, TUN, or H2O2 in PrPc cells. Since antibodies to detect cleaved caspase-12 are not available, we measured loss of native procaspase-12 as an indicator of increased caspase-12 activation Caspase-12 was activated as early as 1 h in BFA- and TUN-treated PrPc and PrPko cells (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 4A, treatment with 30 μM BFA and 6 μM TUN for 3 h induced the activation of caspase-12, as determined by the loss of procaspase 12 (50 kDa) in PrPko and PrPc cells. However, exposure to 100 μM H2O2 did not significantly decrease the 50 kDa caspase-12 band compared to untreated control cells (Fig. 4A). Further, there were no significant differences in caspase-12 activation between PrPc and PrPko cells in the different treatments. Nitrocellulose membranes were reprobed with β-actin antibody to confirm equal protein loading. The results were deduced from densitometric analysis of the 50 kDa native caspase-12 band normalized to β-actin band (data not shown).
Fig. 4.
Effect of PrPc on H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced caspase-12 and PKCδ cleavage. (A) Caspase-12 activation in PrPc and PrPko cells, (B) PKCδ cleavage in PrPc cells, and (C) PKCδ cleavage in PrPko cells. Subconfluent undifferentiated PrPc and PrPko cells were exposed to 30–100 μM H2O2, 10–30 μM BFA, or 2–6 μM TUN, and assayed for caspase-12 activation 3 h post-treatment (loss of procaspase-12), and PKCδ cleavage 12 h post-treatment. Cell lysates were obtained as described, and were separated by 10–12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane; PKCδ was detected using rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against their catalytic subunits. To confirm equal protein loading in each lane, the membranes were reprobed with β-actin antibody. The immunoblots were visualized using the GE Healthcare’s ECL detection agents.
Oxidative and ER stress induce proteolytic cleavage of PKCδ
Recently, we demonstrated that PKCδ is one of the important endogenous substrates of caspase-3 in neuronal cells [44–46]. Activated caspase-3 cleaves PKCδ, yielding a 38 kDa regulatory fragment and a 41 kDa catalytic fragment, resulting in persistently active kinase. Since H2O2, BFA, and TUN exposure resulted in a profound activation of caspase-3, we decided to examine the proteolytic cleavage of PKCδ. After treatment of PrPko and PrPc cells with 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN for 12 h, we observed that a significant proportion of native PKCδ (72–74 kDa) protein was proteolytically cleaved to yield the 41 kDa catalytically active fragment when immunoblotted with an antibody raised against PKCδ. We observed a dose-dependent increase in the proteolytic cleavage of PKCδ in both PrPc (Fig. 4B) and PrPko cells (Fig. 4C); however, proteolytic cleavage of PKCδ was more pronounced in PrPc cells compared to treated PrPko cells. On the contrary, the 41 kDa PKCδ cleaved band was less pronounced in H2O2-treated PrPc cells as compared to PrPko cells. Very little or no cleavage was observed in untreated cells. Further, oxidative and ER stress-induced proteolytic cleavage of PKCδ was also isoform-specific, as H2O2, BFA, and TUN treatment failed to induce proteolytic cleavage of PKCα (data not shown). In order to further, confirm that PKCδ cleavage is mediated by caspase-3, we used the caspase-3-specific inhibitor Z-DEVD-FMK to block cleavage. Cotreatment with 100 μM Z-DEVD-FMK for 12 h almost completely prevented the appearance of the 41 kDa catalytically active PKCδ fragment in 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, and 2μM TUN-treated PrPc cells (data not shown). Nitrocellulose membranes were reprobed with β-actin antibody and the density of the 43 kDa β-actin band was identical in all lanes, confirming equal protein loading.
Caspase-3 mediates oxidative and ER stress-induced increases in PKCδ kinase activity
Immunoprecipitation kinase assays were performed to determine if the H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced caspase-3-dependent accumulation of PKCδ cleaved product is attributed to an increase in PKCδ enzyme activity. PKCδ immunoprecipitates from cytosolic fractions were assayed for PKCδ kinase activity in the absence of DAG and phosphatidyl serine to solely determine the kinase activity of cleaved catalytic PKCδ fragment. The PKCδ enzymatic activity increased at 12 h exposure to 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, and 2 μM TUN in both PrPc and PrPko cells (Fig. 5A). Densitometric analysis of phosphorylated histone H1 substrate bands in Fig. 5A revealed that increases in PKCδ kinase activity were more pronounced in BFA- and TUN-treated PrPc cells compared to PrPko cells. On the other hand, increases in PKCδ kinase activity were less pronounced in H2O2-treated PrPc cells compared to PrPko cells. Very little or no increase in kinase activity was observed in untreated cells. Cotreatment with 100 μM Z-DEVD-FMK significantly blocked H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced increases in PKCδ kinase activity in PrPc and PrPko cells (Fig. 5B). We attribute the increased kinase activity in H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-treated cells to the persistently active proteolytically cleaved PKCδ catalytic fragment.
Fig. 5.
Effect of PrPc on H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced PKCδ kinase activity. (A) PKCδ kinase assay and (B) Effect of Z-DEVD-FMK. Subconfluent undifferentiated PrPc and PrPko cells were harvested at 12 h post-treatment with 100 μM H2O2, 10–30 μM BFA, or 2–6 μM TUN with or without the inclusion of 100 μM Z-DEVD-FMK for 12 h. For in vitro PKCδ activity, substrate (histone H1) and [γ-32P] ATP were added to the immunoprecipitated samples. The immunoprecipitation kinase assay was performed as described. The bands were quantified with a PhoshoImager after scanning the dried gel, and are expressed as percent of control (untreated cells). Data represent the mean ± SEM, N = 5, from two independent experiments. Asterisks (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01) indicate significant differences between treated and respective untreated control cells.
Effect of PrPc on oxidative and ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death
To understand the functional consequence of the activation of many apoptotic factors including caspases and PKCδ, we examined oxidative and ER stress-induced DNA fragmentation. Chromosomal breakdown of DNA into 200-base pair nucleosomal fragments and DNA condensation are hallmarks of cells undergoing apoptosis [12, 13]. As shown in Fig. 6, exposure to 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN for 24 h induced DNA fragmentation by 152, 355, and 379% in PrPc and 244, 229, and 225% in PrPko cells, respectively, compared to untreated controls. BFA- and TUN-induced increases in DNA fragmentation were significantly higher in PrPc cells, and H2O2-induced increases were significantly less in PrPc cells compared to PrPko cells. Together, these results suggest that PrPc protects against H2O2-induced increases, but exacerbates BFA- and TUN-induced increases in DNA fragmentation.
Fig. 6.
Effect of PrPc on H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced DNA fragmentation. PrPc and PrPko cells were treated with 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TUN; cells were lysed after 24 h treatment and assayed for DNA fragmentation as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data represent the mean ± SEM, N = 6, from two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Asterisks (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01) indicate significant differences between treated and respective untreated control cells.
Pharmacological dissection of ER and oxidative stress-induced cell death signaling mechanisms
Based on time-course of activation, sequential activation of caspase-12, caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3, proteolytic activation of PKCδ, and apoptotic cell death occur in BFA- and TUN-treated cells, whereas in H2O2-treated cells, ROS is generated first and is followed by caspase-9, caspase-3, proteolytic activation of PKCδ and apoptotic cell death. To confirm this sequential activation, we used pharmacological inhibitors directed against ROS production (2 μM MnTBAP, SOD mimetic), mitochondrial permeability transition pore (1 μM cyclosporine A, CsA), caspase-8 (100 μM Z-IETD-FMK), caspase-9 (100 μM Z-LEHD-FMK), caspase-3 (100 μM Z-DEVD-FMK), and PKCδ (2 μM rottlerin). Co-treatment of PrPc cells with these inhibitors did not prevent BFA- and TUN-induced loss of the 50 kDa procaspase-12 band in western blot experiments (data not shown). These results suggest that caspase-12 activation is not influenced by inhibitors directed against ROS, mitochondrial permeability transition pore, caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-3 or PKCδ during in BFA- and TUN-treated PrPc cells.
Next, we examined the effect of these inhibitors on H2O2- (Fig. 7A), BFA- (Fig. 7B), and TUN-induced (Fig. 7C) caspase-3 activation in PrPc cells. As shown in Fig. 7, a 12 h cotreatment with either CsA or Z-LEHD-FMK significantly blocked H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced increases in caspase-3 activation. Cotreatment with MnTBAP significantly blocked H2O2-, but not BFA- and TUN-induced increases in caspase-3 activation; however, cotreatment with Z-IETD-FMK significantly suppressed BFA- and TUN-, but not H2O2-induced increases in caspase-3 activation. These results suggest that MPT pore and caspase-9 mediate BFA-, TUN-, and H2O2-induced increases in caspase-3 activation, whereas ROS mediates only H2O2-induced increases, and caspase-8 mediates BFA- and TUN-induced increases in caspase-3 activity.
Fig. 7.
Effect of ROS-, MPT pore-, and caspase inhibitors on caspase-3 activation. Briefly, PrPc cells were treated with (A) 100 μM H2O2, (B) 10 μM BFA, or (C) 2 μM TUN, in the presence or absence of 2 μM MnTBAP (ROS inhibitor), 2 μM CsA (MPT pore inhibitor), 100 μM Z-IETD-FMK (caspase-8 inhibitor), or 100 μM Z-LEHD-FMK (caspase-9 inhibitor). After a 12 h treatment, caspase-3 enzymatic activity was measured in cell samples as described. Data represent the mean ± SEM, N = 6, from two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Pound sign (## p<0.01) indicates significant differences between H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-treated and inhibitor-treated groups.
Finally, we examined the effect of these inhibitors on H2O2- (Fig. 8A), BFA- (Fig. 8B), and TUN- (Fig. 8C) induced increases in DNA fragmentation. As shown in Fig. 8, cotreatment with inhibitors directed against mitochondrial permeability transition pore, caspase-9, caspase-3, and PKCδ significantly attenuated the H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced increases in DNA fragmentation. Cotreatment with the caspase-8 inhibitor Z-IETD-FMK almost completely attenuated BFA- and TUN-, but not H2O2-induced increases in DNA fragmentation. Conversely, cotreatment with the ROS inhibitor MnTBAP significantly blocked H2O2-, but not BFA- and TUN-induced increases in DNA fragmentation over a 24 h treatment. To confirm the key results obtained with PrPc cells, PrPko cells were exposed to 10 μM BFA and 2 μM TUN for 24 h in the presence of pharmacological inhibitors. As shown in Fig 9, rottlerin (2 μM), Z-IETD-FMK (100μM), and Z-DEVD-FMK (100μM) all significantly reduced BFA and TUN-induced increases in DNA fragmentation to that of untreated control PrPko levels. Together, these results suggest that oxidative stress initiates apoptotic cell signaling by generating ROS, and ER-stress initiates caspase-12 activation followed by caspase-8 activation, indicating both oxidative and ER stress share a common apoptotic cell signaling pathway that is mediated by mitochondria, caspase-9, caspase-3, and PKCδ.
Fig. 8.
Effect of ROS-, MPT pore-, caspase-, and PKCδ-inhibitors on apoptotic cell death in PrPc expressing cells. PrPc cells were treated with (A) 100 μM H2O2, (B) 10 μM BFA, or (C) 2 μM TUN, in the presence or absence of 2 μM MnTBAP (ROS inhibitor), 2 μM CsA (MPT pore inhibitor), 100 μM Z-IETD-FMK (caspase-8 inhibitor), 100 μM Z-LEHD-FMK (caspase-9 inhibitor), 100 μM Z-DEVD-FMK, or 2 μM rottlerin (PKCδ inhibitor). After 24 h treatment, DNA fragmentation was measured using an ELISA sandwich assay as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data represent the mean ± SEM, N = 6, from two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Pound sign (## p<0.01) indicates significant differences between H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-treated and inhibitor-treated groups.
Fig. 9.
Effect of caspase and PKCδ-inhibitors on apoptotic cell death in PrPko cells. PrPko cells were treated with 10 μM BFA or 2 μM TUN, in the presence or absence 100 μM Z-IETD-FMK (caspase-8 inhibitor), 100 μM Z-DEVD-FMK, or 2 μM rottlerin (PKCδ inhibitor). After 24 h treatment, DNA fragmentation was measured using an ELISA sandwich assay as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data represent the mean ± SEM, N = 3, from one experiment performed in triplicate. Asterix sign (** p<0.01) indicates significant differences between BFA- and TUN-treated and untreated control cells. Pound sign (## p<0.01) indicates significant differences between H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-treated and inhibitor-treated groups.
Overexpression of PKCδD327A-CRM and PKCδK376R-DNM rescue PrPc cells from ER- and Oxidative stress-induced apoptotic cell death
We used loss-of-function approaches to demonstrate that caspase-3-dependent proteolytic activation of PKCδ mediates apoptotic cell death in PrPc cells. We used two PKCδ mutants to evaluate the loss-of-function approach: the PKCδK376R-DNM mutant in which the caspase-3 cleavage site is intact but the catalytic site is mutated to render the kinase inactive, and the PKCδD327A-CRM mutant in which the cleavage site is mutated to render PKCδ resistant to cleavage by caspase-3 with the catalytic site intact (Fig. 10A). We examined whether H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced apoptotic cell death is suppressed in PrPc cells transiently expressing PKCδD327A-CRM and PKCδK376R-DNM mutants (Fig. 10B). The transfection efficiency was >75%. PrPc cells expressing GFP alone were used as controls. Figure 10C shows that BFA- and TUN-induced DNA fragmentation was significantly reduced in PrPc cells overexpressing PKCδK376R and PKCδD327A mutant proteins as compared to GFP vector-expressing cells. Figure 10C also shows similar results for H2O2-induced DNA fragmentation. Data were normalized to the % GFP expression in matched untreated Vector-GFP or PKCdD327A-GFP, or PKCdK376R-GFP expressing cells. Overall, these data suggest overexpression of PKCδK376R and PKCδD327A mutant proteins can rescue PrPc cells from oxidative and ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death.
Fig. 10.
Overexpression of PKCδK376R-DNM and PKCδD327A-CRM mutant proteins rescue PrPc cells from BFA- and TUN-induced apoptotic cell death. (A) Plasmid description, (B) transient expression, and (C) DNA fragmentation. Briefly, PrPc cells transiently expressing caspase cleavage-resistant PKCδD327A-CRM, dominant negative PKCdK376R-DNM, and GFP alone were exposed to 100 μM H2O2, 10 μM BFA, or 2 μM TFA for 24 h. DNA fragmentation was quantified using an ELISA assay as described in the Methods section. Data points represent mean ± SEM, N=6, from two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Asterisks (**p<0.01) indicate significant differences between treated and respective untreated GFP-vector expressing cells. Pound sign (## p<0.01) indicates significant differences between GFP vector-expressing cells and PKCδD327A-CRM or PKCδK376R-DNM-expressing PrPc cells.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrate the dual and opposing roles of PrPc in mediating oxidative and ER stress-induced cell death. PrPc plays a protective role during oxidative stress, and a proapoptotic role during ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death. This study also demonstrates that caspase-3-dependent proteolytic activation of PKCδ plays a role in both oxidative and ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing proapoptotic function of PKCδ in cellular models of prion disease.
Previous studies have shown the antioxidant property of PrPc during oxidative stress-induced cell death in cell culture and animal models of prion disease [22–27]. We found H2O2-induced increases in intracellular ROS levels were significantly attenuated in PrPc expressing cells when compared to PrPko cells. ROS generation was observed as early as 15 min following H2O2 exposure in both cell types, indicating that ROS generation precedes the cytotoxic response. We attribute the partially protective effect of PrPc on H2O2-induced ROS production to its antioxidant property. Further, exposure to BFA and TUN did not induce any increase in ROS generation up to 60 min in PrPc cells, suggesting that ROS is a key mediator of H2O2-induced but not BFA- and TUN-induced cytotoxic response.
Previous reports have shown the involvement of ROS and caspases in mediating cell death induced by PrPsc and the human PrP106–126 toxic fragment [16–18, 34, 47]. Perturbation of calcium homeostasis and accumulation of misfolded PrPc proteins in the ER also elicit stress responses which are detrimental to the cells [48]. Molecular mechanisms linking ER stress and cell death in neuronal cell lines have recently been described in which activation of ER-resident caspase-12 leads to caspase-3 activation and cell death [15, 17, 43, 49]. However, the effect of PrPc in oxidative and ER stress-induced activation of caspases and cell death is not well established. Here we show that H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced cytotoxic cell death is mediated by caspases. Further, BFA- and TUN-induced activation of caspase-3 and caspase-9 was exacerbated in PrPc cells compared to PrPko cells. Unlike BFA and TUN, H2O2-induced increases in caspase-9 and caspase-3 enzyme activities were significantly reduced in PrPc cells. Additionally, BFA- and TUN-induced activation of caspase-8 and caspase-12 was also exacerbated in PrPc cells. Caspase-8 and caspase-12 were not activated in either H2O2-treated PrPc or PrPko cells. Time-course analysis revealed the activation sequence is caspase-12 (1 h), caspase-8 (3 h), caspase-9 (6 h), and caspase-3 (12 h) in BFA- and TUN-treated cells, while the activation sequence in H2O2-treated PrPc cells was ROS generation followed by activation of caspase-9 and c aspase-3. Recently, Hetz et al. showed that caspase-12 and ER stress mediate neurotoxicity of PrPsc [34]. In addition to caspase-12, other ER-resident caspases, such as caspase-4 have also been implicated in apoptotic cell death in infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (INCL), a childhood neurodegenerative storage disorder [50]. On the contrary, studies have also shown caspase-12 and caspase-4 are not required for caspase-dependent ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death [51].
Recently, we and others established PKCδ as an emerging putative substrate for caspase-3 [44–46]. Here we show H2O2, BFA, and TUN exposures induced proteolytic activation of PKCδ in PrPc and PrPko cells, which can be effectively blocked with the caspase-3 inhibitor Z-DEVD-FMK, indicating that the cleavage is mediated by caspase-3. However, the extent of PKCδ cleavage was significantly reduced in H2O2-treated PrPc cells and significantly enhanced in BFA- and TUN-treated PrPc cells compared to PrPko cells, suggesting that PrPc is capable of attenuating oxidative stress-induced PKCδ cleavage and exacerbating ER stress-induced proteolytic activation of PKCδ. For the first time, we demonstrate PKCδ proteolytic activation during ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death.
DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation are terminal events in the apoptotic process and are considered biochemical hallmarks of apoptosis [12, 13]. Previous reports have shown that PrPsc and the human PrP106–126 toxic fragment induce DNA fragmentation [16–18, 34, 47]. Here we show the differential effect of PrPc on oxidative and ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death. Quantitative DNA ELISA assays revealed H2O2, BFA, and TUN all induced DNA fragmentation in PrPc and PrPko cells. Consistent with caspases and proteolytic cleavage of PKCδ, DNA fragmentation was significantly reduced in H2O2-treated cells, and significantly exacerbated in BFA- and TUN-treated PrPc cells. Furthermore, pretreatment with pharmacological inhibitors directed against MPT pore, caspase-9, caspase-3, and PKCδ significantly suppressed H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced DNA fragmentation in PrPc cells, indicating that mitochondrial dysfunction, caspase-9, caspase-3, and PKCδ activities mediate the cell death events. Additionally, a ROS inhibitor selectively blocked H2O2-, but not BFA- and TUN-induced DNA fragmentation, whereas a caspase-8 inhibitor selectively blocked BFA- and TUN-, but not H2O2-induced DNA fragmentation. Further confirmation of the role of proteolytically activated PKCδ fragments in H2O2-, BFA-, and TUN-induced apoptosis is supported by loss-of-function dominant negative experiments performed in PrPc cells overexpressing caspase cleavage resistant PKCδD327A and kinase dead PKCδK376R mutant proteins. H2O2, BFA, and TUN treatments all produced a significant increase in DNA fragmentation in GFP vector-expressing cells, and induced a moderate increase in DNA fragmentation in PKCδD327A or PKCδK376R overexpressing cells, thus confirming the contribution of proteolytically activated PKCδ in oxidative and ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death.
How PrPc, a plasma membrane protein, helps to protect against oxidative stress and exacerbates ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death is unclear. Recently, a number of laboratories have reported altered subcellular distribution, misfolding, and trafficking of PrPc protein during scrapie-infections and/or during stress [10, 52–60]. PrPc misfolding at the plasma membrane results in endocytosis, intracellular retention, and degradation of PrPc [61, 62]. Both proteasomes and ubiquitin are involved in the turnover of the wild-type prion protein [63]. Studies have also shown PrPc positively regulates neural precursor proliferation during developmental and adult mammalian neurogenesis and is also expressed in long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells and is important for their self-renewal [64, 65]. Prion protein with a stop codon at Y145stop mutation was shown to be degraded very rapidly by the proteasome-mediated pathway, and blockage of proteasomal degradation resulted in the intracellular accumulation of PK-resistant PrP (Y145stop), suggesting that the mutant prion protein is degraded through the proteasomal pathway and acquires PK-resistance if degradation is impaired [66]. An amber mutation at codon 145 (Y145stop) of the PrPc gene results in a variant of an inherited human prion disease known as Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker (GSS) syndrome. PrPc with the Y145stop mutation also induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and PrP-containing deposits in vitro [67]. Conflicting studies have shown cytosolic accumulation of PrPc is both not neurotoxic [68] and neurotoxic [39]. Further, PrPc retrogradely transported out of the endoplasmic reticulum produced both amorphous aggregates and a PrPsc-like conformation in the cytosol, suggesting that PrPc has an inherent capacity to promote its own conformational conversion in mammalian cells [38]. However, other studies have shown PrPc does not retrotranslocate from the ER into the cytoplasm prior to degradation by the proteasome [69]. In addition, PrPc has been shown to contain cryptic nuclear localization signals, which may suggest abnormal PrP forms may accumulate in the nucleus and initiate neurotoxicity through hitherto unknown mechanisms [70]. Further, the apparent reduction in mono- and di-N-glycosylated PrPc levels in BFA and TUN treated PrPc cells observed in Western blot experiments could hurt cell survival in more than one way. Reduced PrPc levels could lead to a loss of cell surface PrPc resulting in reduced antioxidant capacity, and making the cells vulnerable to ER-stress, alternatively. Improperly processed PrPc in the ER-could also elicit an unfolded protein response to facilitate its degradation. It is also possible that the retro-translocation of improperly processed PrPc to the cytoplasm and nucleus may contribute to the exacerbated toxicity observed in BFA and TUN cells. Preliminary studies from our laboratory indicate that misfolded PrPc is retrotranslocated to the cytosol and/or nucleus during ER stress, and during oxidative stress PrPc with native confirmation is translocated to the cytosol from the plasma membrane (unpublished observations). We are currently investigating the hypothesis of whether accumulation of misfolded PrPc in the cytosol or nucleus may be toxic, and whether accumulation of PrPc with native conformation in the cytosol may be beneficial to the cell.
In conclusion, the present study emphasizes the opposing roles of PrPc in mediating oxidative and ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death in spatial and temporal manner (see schematic Fig. 11). Pharmacological and genetic dissection revealed that ER-stressors BFA- and TUN 1.) activate caspase-12, caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-3, and PKCδ in a sequential manner, and 2.) subsequently result in DNA fragmentation and cell death. Similarly, oxidative stressor H2O2 induces ROS production, cytochrome C release, activation of caspase-9, caspase-3, and PKCδ and subsequently DNA fragmentation and cell death. Further, there exists a cross-talk between ER and mitochondria during ER-stress but not during oxidative stress. For the first time, we demonstrate that PrPc plays differential roles in cell death response i.e. a pro-apoptotic role during ER stress, and an anti-apoptotic role during oxidative stress-induced cell death. Our results also suggest that PKCδ may be a key downstream proapoptoic effector in cell death processes associated with misfolded prion protein-induced neurotoxicity.
Fig. 11.
A proposed model describing the apoptotic cell signaling events during oxidative and ER stress-induced cell death in PrP and PrPko cells. BFA and TUN induce activation of caspase-12 and caspase-8; H2O2 induces ROS production ; BFA, TUN, and H2O2 all activate caspase-9 which activates caspase-3, which then mediates proteolytic activation of PKCδ. Protealytically cleaved PKCδ induces DNA fragmentation and apoptotic cell death. The inhibitory action of pharmacological inhibitors: MnTBAP (ROS inhibitor); CsA, cyclosporine A (MPT, mitochondrial permeability transition pore inhibitor); Z-IETD-FMK (caspase-8 inhibitor); Z-LEHD-FMK (caspase-9 inhibitor); Z-DEVD-FMK (caspase-3 inhibitor); rottlerin (PKCδ inhibitor; and (loss-of-function dominant negative mutants (PKCδD327A-CRM and PKCδ K376R-DNM) are shown in the proposed pathway. In essence, our data suggest that PrPc protects against oxidative stress and exacerbates ER stress-induced apoptotic cell death signaling events.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported in part by Department of Defense grant W81XWH-05-1-0239, Iowa Livestock Health Advisory Council/College of Veterinary Medicine and NIH grant ES10586. W. Eugene and Linda Lloyd Endowed Professorship and Chair to AGK is also acknowledged. We would like to acknowledge Keri Henderson for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- BFA
brefeldin A
- TUN
tunicamycin
- H2O2
hydrogen peroxide
- Z-VAD-FMK
Z-Val-Ala-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone
- Z-DEVD-FMK
Z-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone
- Z-IETD-FMK
Z-Ile-Glu-Thr-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone
- Z-LEHD-FMK
Z-Leu-Glu-His-Asp-Fluoro Methyl Ketone
- Ac-DEVD-AFC
Acetyl Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-AFC
- Ac-IETD-AFC
Acetyl Ile-Glu-Thr-Asp-AFC
- Ac-LEHD-AFC
Acetyl-Leu-Glu-His-Asp-AFC
- MnTBAP
Mn(III)tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)porphyrin chloride
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- CsA
cyclosporine A
- MPT
mitochondrial permeability transition pore
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- PrPc
prion-expressing neural cells
- PrPko
neural cells lacking the prion protein (knockout)
- PKCδ
protein kinase Cδ
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.McKintosh E, Tabrizi SJ, Collinge J. Prion diseases. J Neurovirol. 2003;9:183–93. doi: 10.1080/13550280390194082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prusiner SB, Scott MR, DeArmond SJ, Cohen FE. Prion protein biology. Cell. 1998;93:337–48. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81163-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Priola SA, Chesebro B, Caughey B. Biomedicine. A view from the top--prion diseases from 10,000 feet. Science. 2003;300:917–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1085920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown P, Cervenakova L. A prion lexicon (out of control) Lancet. 2005;365:122. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17700-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chiesa R, Harris DA. Prion diseases: what is the neurotoxic molecule? . Neurobiol Dis. 2001;8:743–63. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aguzzi A, Polymenidou M. Mammalian prion biology: one century of evolving concepts. Cell. 2004;116:313–27. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01031-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weissmann C. The state of the prion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:861–71. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Castilla J, Saa P, Hetz C, Soto C. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell. 2005;121:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Legname G, Baskakov IV, Nguyen HO, Riesner D, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Synthetic mammalian prions. Science. 2004;305:673–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1100195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Forman MS, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Neurodegenerative diseases: a decade of discoveries paves the way for therapeutic breakthroughs. Nat Med. 2004;10:1055–63. doi: 10.1038/nm1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dawson TM, Dawson VL. Molecular pathways of neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. Science. 2003;302:819–22. doi: 10.1126/science.1087753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reed JC. Apoptosis mechanisms: implications for cancer drug discovery. Oncology (Huntingt) 2004;18:11–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cain K, Bratton SB, Cohen GM. The Apaf-1 apoptosome: a large caspase- activating complex. Biochimie. 2002;84:203–14. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(02)01376-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gorman AM, Ceccatelli S, Orrenius S. Role of mitochondria in neuronal apoptosis. Dev Neurosci. 2000;22:348–58. doi: 10.1159/000017460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rao RV, Ellerby HM, Bredesen DE. Coupling endoplasmic reticulum stress to the cell death program. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11:372–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Szegezdi E, Fitzgerald U, Samali A. Caspase-12 and ER-stress-mediated apoptosis: the story so far. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1010:186–94. doi: 10.1196/annals.1299.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Momoi T. Caspases involved in ER stress-mediated cell death. J Chem Neuroanat. 2004;28:101–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2004.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jimbo A, Fujita E, Kouroku Y, Ohnishi J, Inohara N, Kuida K, Sakamaki K, Yonehara S, Momoi T. ER stress induces caspase-8 activation, stimulating cytochrome c release and caspase-9 activation. Exp Cell Res. 2003;283:156–66. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(02)00033-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim JI, Choi SI, Kim NH, Jin JK, Choi EK, Carp RI, Kim YS. Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration in prion diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;928:182–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Milhavet O, Lehmann S. Oxidative stress and the prion protein in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002;38:328–39. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wong BS, Pan T, Liu T, Li R, Petersen RB, Jones IM, Gambetti P, Brown DR, Sy MS. Prion disease: A loss of antioxidant function? . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;275:249–52. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Senator A, Rachidi W, Lehmann S, Favier A, Benboubetra M. Prion protein protects against DNA damage induced by paraquat in cultured cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37:1224–30. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brown DR, Nicholas RS, Canevari L. Lack of prion protein expression results in a neuronal phenotype sensitive to stress. J Neurosci Res. 2002;67:211–24. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim BH, Lee HG, Choi JK, Kim JI, Choi EK, Carp RI, Kim YS. The cellular prion protein (PrPC) prevents apoptotic neuronal cell death and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by serum deprivation. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004;124:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.White AR, Collins SJ, Maher F, Jobling MF, Stewart LR, Thyer JM, Beyreuther K, Masters CL, Cappai R. Prion protein-deficient neurons reveal lower glutathione reductase activity and increased susceptibility to hydrogen peroxide toxicity. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:1723–30. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65487-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roucou X, Gains M, LeBlanc AC. Neuroprotective functions of prion protein. J Neurosci Res. 2004;75:153–61. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hetz C, Maundrell K, Soto C. Is loss of function of the prion protein the cause of prion disorders? . Trends Mol Med. 2003;9:237–43. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(03)00069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thellung S, Villa V, Corsaro A, Arena S, Millo E, Damonte G, Benatti U, Tagliavini F, Florio T, Schettini G. p38 MAP kinase mediates the cell death induced by PrP106–126 in the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Neurobiol Dis. 2002;9:69–81. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.O'Donovan CN, Tobin D, Cotter TG. Prion protein fragment PrP-(106–126) induces apoptosis via mitochondrial disruption in human neuronal SH-SY5Y cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:43516–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103894200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Marella M, Gaggioli C, Batoz M, Deckert M, Tartare-Deckert S, Chabry J. Pathological prion protein exposure switches on neuronal mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway resulting in microglia recruitment. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1529–34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410966200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cronier S, Laude H, Peyrin JM. Prions can infect primary cultured neurons and astrocytes and promote neuronal cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12271–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402725101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fioriti L, Quaglio E, Massignan T, Colombo L, Stewart RS, Salmona M, Harris DA, Forloni G, Chiesa R. The neurotoxicity of prion protein (PrP) peptide 106–126 is independent of the expression level of PrP and is not mediated by abnormal PrP species. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;28:165–76. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chiesa R, Piccardo P, Dossena S, Nowoslawski L, Roth KA, Ghetti B, Harris DA. Bax deletion prevents neuronal loss but not neurological symptoms in a transgenic model of inherited prion disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:238–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406173102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hetz C, Russelakis-Carneiro M, Maundrell K, Castilla J, Soto C. Caspase-12 and endoplasmic reticulum stress mediate neurotoxicity of pathological prion protein. Embo J. 2003;22:5435–45. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brandner S, Isenmann S, Raeber A, Fischer M, Sailer A, Kobayashi Y, Marino S, Weissmann C, Aguzzi A. Normal host prion protein necessary for scrapie-induced neurotoxicity. Nature. 1996;379:339–43. doi: 10.1038/379339a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mallucci G, Dickinson A, Linehan J, Klohn PC, Brandner S, Collinge J. Depleting neuronal PrP in prion infection prevents disease and reverses spongiosis. Science. 2003;302:871–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1090187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roucou X, LeBlanc AC. Cellular prion protein neuroprotective function: implications in prion diseases. J Mol Med. 2005;83:3–11. doi: 10.1007/s00109-004-0605-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ma J, Lindquist S. Conversion of PrP to a self-perpetuating PrPSc-like conformation in the cytosol. Science. 2002;298:1785–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1073619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ma J, Wollmann R, Lindquist S. Neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration when PrP accumulates in the cytosol. Science. 2002;298:1781–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1073725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Solforosi L, Criado JR, McGavern DB, Wirz S, Sanchez-Alavez M, Sugama S, DeGiorgio LA, Volpe BT, Wiseman E, Abalos G, Masliah E, Gilden D, Oldstone MB, Conti B, Williamson RA. Cross-linking cellular prion protein triggers neuronal apoptosis in vivo. Science. 2004;303:1514–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1094273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Anantharam V, Kitazawa M, Latchoumycandane C, Kanthasamy A, Kanthasamy AG. Blockade of PKC{delta} Proteolytic Activation by Loss of Function Mutants Rescues Mesencephalic Dopaminergic Neurons from Methylcyclopentadienyl Manganese Tricarbonyl (MMT)-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1035:271–89. doi: 10.1196/annals.1332.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Anantharam V, Kitazawa M, Wagner J, Kaul S, Kanthasamy AG. Caspase-3-dependent proteolytic cleavage of protein kinase Cdelta is essential for oxidative stress-mediated dopaminergic cell death after exposure to methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl. J Neurosci. 2002;22:1738–51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01738.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen L, Gao X. Neuronal apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Neurochem Res. 2002;27:891–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1020387414086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brodie C, Blumberg PM. Regulation of cell apoptosis by protein kinase c delta. Apoptosis. 2003;8:19–27. doi: 10.1023/a:1021640817208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kanthasamy AG, Kitazawa M, Kanthasamy A, Anantharam V. Role of proteolytic activation of protein kinase Cdelta in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2003;5:609–20. doi: 10.1089/152308603770310275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kikkawa U, Matsuzaki H, Yamamoto T. Protein kinase C delta (PKC delta): activation mechanisms and functions. J Biochem (Tokyo) 2002;132:831–9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chun HS, Lee H, Son JH. Manganese induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and activates multiple caspases in nigral dopaminergic neuronal cells, SN4741. Neurosci Lett. 2001;316:5–8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02341-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nakagawa T, Zhu H, Morishima N, Li E, Xu J, Yankner BA, Yuan J. Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-beta. Nature. 2000;403:98–103. doi: 10.1038/47513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mehmet H. Caspases find a new place to hide. Nature. 2000;403:29–30. doi: 10.1038/47377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim SJ, Zhang Z, Hitomi E, Lee YC, Mukherjee AB. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced caspase-4 activation mediates apoptosis and neurodegeneration in INCL. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:1826–34. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Obeng EA, Boise LH. Caspase-12 and caspase-4 are not required for caspase-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:29578–87. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502685200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dawson M, Warner R, Nolan A, McKeown B, Thomson J. 'Complex' PrP genotypes identified by the National Scrapie Plan. Vet Rec. 2003;152:754–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Caramelli M, Ru G, Acutis P, Forloni G. Prion diseases: current understanding of epidemiology and pathogenesis, and therapeutic advances. CNS Drugs. 2006;20:15–28. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200620010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Campana V, Sarnataro D, Zurzolo C. The highways and byways of prion protein trafficking. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:102–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Choi CJ, Kanthasamy A, Anantharam V, Kanthasamy AG. Interaction of metals with prion protein: Possible role of divalent cations in the pathogenesis of prion diseases. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:777–87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Aguzzi A. Prion diseases of humans and farm animals: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. J Neurochem. 2006;97:1726–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Harris DA, True HL. New insights into prion structure and toxicity. Neuron. 2006;50:353–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Brown DR. Neurodegeneration and oxidative stress: prion disease results from loss of antioxidant defence. Folia Neuropathol. 2005;43:229–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hetz CA, Soto C. Stressing out the ER: a role of the unfolded protein response in prion-related disorders. Curr Mol Med. 2006;6:37–43. doi: 10.2174/156652406775574578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Taylor DR, Hooper NM. The prion protein and lipid rafts. Mol Membr Biol. 2006;23:89–99. doi: 10.1080/09687860500449994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Orsi A, Fioriti L, Chiesa R, Sitia R. Conditions of endoplasmic reticulum stress favor the accumulation of cytosolic prion protein. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:30431–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605320200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kiachopoulos S, Heske J, Tatzelt J, Winklhofer KF. Misfolding of the prion protein at the plasma membrane induces endocytosis, intracellular retention and degradation. Traffic. 2004;5:426–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9219.2004.00185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yedidia Y, Horonchik L, Tzaban S, Yanai A, Taraboulos A. Proteasomes and ubiquitin are involved in the turnover of the wild-type prion protein. Embo J. 2001;20:5383–91. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.19.5383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang CC, Steele AD, Lindquist S, Lodish HF. Prion protein is expressed on long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells and is important for their self-renewal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2184–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510577103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Steele AD, Emsley JG, Ozdinler PH, Lindquist S, Macklis JD. Prion protein (PrPc) positively regulates neural precursor proliferation during developmental and adult mammalian neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3416–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511290103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zanusso G, Petersen RB, Jin T, Jing Y, Kanoush R, Ferrari S, Gambetti P, Singh N. Proteasomal degradation and N-terminal protease resistance of the codon 145 mutant prion protein. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:23396–404. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hachiya NS, Watanabe K, Kawabata MY, Jozuka A, Kozuka Y, Sakasegawa Y, Kaneko K. Prion protein with Y145STOP mutation induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and PrP-containing deposits in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;327:894–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fioriti L, Dossena S, Stewart LR, Stewart RS, Harris DA, Forloni G, Chiesa R. Cytosolic prion protein (PrP) is not toxic in N2a cells and primary neurons expressing pathogenic PrP mutations. J Biol Chem. 2005 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412441200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Drisaldi B, Stewart RS, Adles C, Stewart LR, Quaglio E, Biasini E, Fioriti L, Chiesa R, Harris DA. Mutant PrP is delayed in its exit from the endoplasmic reticulum, but neither wild-type nor mutant PrP undergoes retrotranslocation prior to proteasomal degradation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:21732–43. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M213247200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gu Y, Hinnerwisch J, Fredricks R, Kalepu S, Mishra RS, Singh N. Identification of cryptic nuclear localization signals in the prion protein. Neurobiol Dis. 2003;12:133–49. doi: 10.1016/s0969-9961(02)00014-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]











