Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Nov 12;65(1):46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.005

Table 5.

Distributions and associations (Odds-Ratios) of scores on the composite risk index with current DSM-IV adult ADHD among respondents who met criteria for ADHD in childhood pooled across the ten surveys (n = 629)

Current ADHD among childhood cases
Distributon1 Prevalence2 Conditional distribution3
% (SE)4 % (SE)4 % (SE)4 OR5 (95% CI)5

I. Composite risk index
 0 16.2 (2.1) 21.2 (5.7) 6.9 (1.7) 1.0 --
 1-2 41.7 (2.8) 46.0 (5.3) 38.5 (4.2) 3.5* (1.6-7.6)
 3-6 32.1 (2.7) 58.6 (9.5) 37.6 (4.2) 8.3* (2.9-23.8)
 7+ 9.9 (1.7) 85.7 (5.1) 17.1 (3.2) 23.8* (7.6-74.4)
  χ236 32.8*
  AUC = .76
*

Significant at the .05 level, two-sided test

1

Distribution: The conditional prevalence of scores on the risk index among respondents with a history of childhood ADHD

2

Prevalence: The conditional prevalence of current adult ADHD among respondents with a history of childhood ADHD in sub-samples defined by the level of the risk index in the row

3

Conditional distribution: The proportion of all respondents with adult ADHD who have scores at each level of the risk index

4

SE: Standard error of the prevalence estimate

5

OR: Odds-ratio; CI: Confidence interval. The ORs are based on a single logistic regression equation that controlled for country in the sub-sample of respondents with a history of childhood ADHD to predict current adult ADHD.

6

The 3 degree of freedom χ2 evaluates the joint significance of the three coefficients for level on the composite risk index in predicting adult persistence of ADHD.