Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 8;10(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1080

Table 3.

Comparison between EMIS LV (EL), EMIS PCS (EP), INPS Vision (IV), and iSoft Synergy (iS) of time taken to code data, prescribe, and record BP data

Coded Data Entry Acute Prescribing Repeat Prescribing BP Recording
EL EP IV iS EL EP IV EL IV EL EP IV iS
N 7 24 14 18 5 7 9 1 4 1 1 5 3
Mean
(SD)
11.5
(3.0)
8.1
(8.0)
6.8
(2.9)
7.9
(2.5)
23.7
(2.5)
27.1
(10.1)
27.5
(8.5)
21
-
8.4
(3.2)
7.1
-
9
-
9.8
(3.4)
6.7
(1.3)
95% CI 8.7 -
14.2
4.7 -
11.5
5.1 -
8.5
6.6 -
9.2
20-5 -
26.8
17.7 -
36.5
20.9 -
34.0
- 3.3 -
13.5
- - 5.6 -
13.9
3.5 -
9.8
Median (IQR) 12.1
(2.8)
5.9
(3.2)
5.7
(3.3)
7.2
(2.7)
23.8
(2.1)
22.1
(15.4)
23.6
(9)
21
-
9.4
(3.8)
7.1
-
9
-
8.8
(1)
7.3
(1.1)
MIN 5.7 2.5 3.6 5.1 21 15.7 19.1 21 4 7.1 9 6.7 5.2
MAX 14.4 40.5 12.5 13.6 27.6 41.9 46.2 21 10.7 7.1 9 15.5 7.5
NPAR* P 0.007 0.006 0.012 0.71 (NS) 0.64 (NS)

*NPAR = nonparametric test compared with EMIS LV; exact statistical significance is shown for the Mann-Whitney U test (2-tailed). NS = not significant.