Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr Sci. 2008 Apr;46(4):356–361. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/46.4.356

Table 4.

Assessment of recovery and matrix effect.

Sample
concentration
Peak Area Extraction
Efficiencye
Matrix
Effectf
Drying
Lossg
Absolute
Recoveryh
Aa Bb Cc Dd
5 ng/ml 47119.5 50466.8 53537.1 54282.8 93.4% 5.7% 1.4% 86.8%
75 ng/ml 735281.4 812394.8 805937.2 819856.8 90.5% -0.8% 1.7% 89.7%

Experiments were conducted in five replicates for each different sample condition:

a

Finasteride spiked into blank plasma, extracted, dried and reconstituted

b

Finasteride spiked into supernatant from blank plasma extraction, dried and reconstituted

c

Finasteride spiked into ethyl acetate, dried and reconstituted

d

Finasteride spiked into mobile phase directly

e

Extraction Efficiency =A/B*100%

f

Matrix Effect =(1-B/C)*100%

g

Drying Loss =(1- C/D)*100%

h

Absolute Recovery = A/D*100%