Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 19;15:120–134.

Table 2. Raw Ct values and relative expression levels for GAPDH and OPA1 in differentiated RGC-5 cells following elevated hydrostatic pressure.

Group number Time Passage number Conditions Ct values GAPDH Ct values OPA1 ΔCt ΔΔCt Relative expression
1
Day 2
34
Control
17.06
28.81
11.75
−0.57
Upregulation by 47.6%
 
 
 
30 mmHg
18.82
30
11.18


 
Day 3
 
Control
17.96
29.17
11.21
0.62
Down-regulation by 37.5%
 
 
 
30 mmHg
17.85
29.68
11.83


2
Day 2
28
Control
16.82
28.36
11.54
−0.48
Upregulation by 36.5%
 
 
 
30 mmHg
16.82
27.88
11.06


 
Day 3
 
Control
16.94
27.87
10.93
0.68
Down-regulation by 37.7%
 
 
 
30 mmHg
17.35
28.96
11.61


3
Day 2
30
Control
16.98
28.34
11.36
−0.27
Upregulation by 20.6%
 
 
 
30 mmHg
16.84
27.93
11.09


 
Day 3
 
Control
18.16
28.51
10.35
0.5
Down-regulation by 31.5%
      30 mmHg 18.51 29.36 10.85

This table showed that expression for GAPDH and OPA1 was not dependent with passage number and GAPDH did not change with elevated hydrostatic pressure. The negative ∆∆Ct represents upregulation of gene expression and the positive ∆∆Ct represents down-regulation of gene expression.