Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2008 Sep 12;10(20):4413–4416. doi: 10.1021/ol8015429

A Method for Detecting Water in Organic Solvents

Haoran Sun 1, Bijia Wang 1, Stephen G DiMagno 1
PMCID: PMC2629997  NIHMSID: NIHMS86357  PMID: 18785750

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms86357u1.jpg

The potent dehydrating ability of difluoro(aryl)-λ3-iodanes is exploited to develop a convenient 19F-NMR-based aquametry method that is more sensitive than coulometric Karl Fischer titration. The key difluoro(aryl)-λ3-iodane reagents are synthesized readily from commercially available and inexpensive precursors.


In modern synthetic chemistry, significant effort may be expended to exclude moisture from reactions. Dehydration procedures are often performed to ensure experimental reproducibility when water-sensitive reagents are used. However, water’s ubiquity, solubility and propensity to physisorb on reaction vessel surfaces often leave the experimentalist to question if putatively anhydrous conditions actually are. The fundamental question “How dry is dry?” proves to be devilishly difficult to answer if an accurate determination of trace water contaminant at the μg level is required.

We reported recently the synthesis of anhydrous fluoride salts, such as tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF), from hexafluorobenzene and tetraalkylammonium cyanides.13 Concurrent with this preparative SNAr reaction, cogenerated hexacyanobenzene scavenges residual water to form tetrabutylammonium pentacyanophenolate and two equivalents of tetrabutylammonium bifluoride (TBAHF2). Thus, the anhydrous fluoride reagents prepared and used in situ are exceptionally dry. Upon isolation of the fluoride salts for storage, the dehydrating agent is removed leaving the reagents susceptible to trace water contamination from solvents and vessels when the salts are redissolved for synthetic chemistry. Existing physical and chemical aquametry methods for quantitative measurement of water in organic solvents (GC, 47 IR,813 and Karl Fischer titration14,15) are not well suited for rapid trace water analysis at the scale (1 mL total solvent volume) or under the conditions used for fluorination. (Sample preparation in an inert atmosphere glove box further complicates aquametry.) We sought an alternative general method that would allow us to determine directly the amount of water in solutions containing dry fluoride salts. We have found that 19F NMR spectroscopy in conjunction with the reagent combination TBAF/PhI(OAc)2 offers a rapid, convenient, general, and exquisitely sensitive (100 ng detection limit) aquametry method. 16,17

Difluoro(aryl)-λ3-iodanes are recognized as being remarkably water sensitive under basic conditions.18 Difluoro(aryl)-λ3-iodanes have been prepared from ArIX2 compounds and aqueous HF,19 by oxidation of iodoarenes with electrophilic fluorine sources (F2,20,21 XeF2,2228 ClF,29 Selectfluor®30) and by treatment of iodosoarenes or bis(trifluoroacetoxy)iodo arenes with SF4.31 We have found that difluoro(phenyl)-λ3-iodane can also be made simply and directly from iodobenzene diacetate (PhI(OAc)2) by ion exchange under anhydrous basic conditions. When a CD3CN solution of carefully dried PhI(OAc)2 is treated with anhydrous TBAF at room temperature, an instantaneous ion exchange occurs to form PhIF2 and TBAOAc in nearly quantitative yield (Scheme 1). If excess added fluoride is present it associates with PhIF2 to form the complex anion PhIF3, as is indicated by a broad and shifting signal in the 19F NMR spectrum. If a slight molar excess of fluoride is present, the signal resonates at approximately −13 ppm; further additions of TBAF shift the fluoride signal upfield. (All 19F chemical shift values are referenced to δ = 0 for CFCl3, used as an external standard.) Analyses of the 19F, 13C and 1H NMR spectra of PhIF2 (19F NMR: δ = −172 ppm) solutions indicated that small amounts (1–2 %) of bifluoride ion (1H NMR: δ = 16.4 ppm, t; 19F NMR: δ = −146.5 ppm, d, JH–F = 121 Hz) and PhIO were also formed. We suspected that these impurities arose from trace water contamination (Scheme 1), and sought to investigate and exploit the water sensitivity of PhIF2 under these conditions.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Preparation and reaction of PhIF2.

PhIF2 reacts slowly with water under acidic or neutral conditions, in keeping with the observation that difluoro(aryl)-λ3-iodanes can be prepared with aqueous HF. However, NMR titration experiments revealed that PhIF2 is hydrolyzed immediately and quantitatively to form HF2 and iodosobenzene (PhIO) in the presence of basic fluoride reagents. The characteristic 19F NMR signal of HF2 resonates near that of the BF4 ion (δ = −151 ppm) permitting TBABF4 to be used as a convenient internal standard.32 Comparative integration of the TBABF4 and TBAHF2 signals allows water-generated bifluoride ion to be quantified easily. To test the accuracy and reproducibility of the TBAF/PhI(OAc)2 method for water detection, we constructed specialized reaction vessels by fusing crimp-top autosampler vials (2.0 mL, borosilicate glass, PTFE/silicone/PTFE septum seal) to the open ends of standard (5 mm) NMR tubes (Figure 1). These customized tubes were charged with PhI(OAc)2, TBAF, TBABF4 (internal standard) and CD3CN, sealed, and baseline 19F NMR spectra of the samples were obtained. For titration experiments involving large amounts of added water (100 to 2000 μg), NMR spectra were gathered and analyzed after multiple measured additions of standardized water solutions through the septum cap of a single tube. The time elapsed between injection and completion of each NMR data acquisition was less than 10 minutes. The change in the integrated peak areas for the BF4 and HF2 signals confirmed that 2 equivalents of HF2 were generated for each equivalent of added H2O (Figure 2). Interestingly, no H-D exchange is observed under these anhydrous conditions, indicating that anhydrous solutions of TBAPhIF3 are significantly less basic than TBAF solutions. Because 1) the TBA cation is susceptible to fluoride-induced E2 elimination in CD3CN upon long standing, and 2) this elimination reaction is suppressed by the weakly basic PhIF3 complex anion, the dehydrating reagent is best prepared with a 1:1 PhIF2:TBAF stoichiometry.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Graphical representation of the water determination experiment. From left to right: 1) TBAF/PhI(OAc)2/TBABF4 mixture in a reaction tube; 2) assay mixture dissolved in CD3CN; 3) side (bottom) and top (top) views of a customized 5 mm NMR tube featuring a fused crimp cap vial septum seal; 4) tube containing solid reagents (TBAF, TBABF4, PhI(OAc)2), CD3CN and sample after the addition of the solvent being tested. The process arrows indicate a) addition of CD 3CN, b) installation of the cap, c) collection of the background 19F NMR spectrum, d) injection of the solvent being tested, e) collection of the final 19F NMR spectrum.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results from the titration of a PhIF2/CD3CN solution with standardized aqueous acetonitrile.

For solutions containing very low water concentrations (less than 10 ppm), we were concerned that sample manipulation could introduce signifcantly more water than that being measured; thus we sought to develop a reproducible “single injection” method. The rationale for this method is that if the septum is only pierced once, all operations may be performed under the inert atmosphere conditions required for very careful work. In the single injection method, the PhIF2/TBAF/TBABF4 reagent is prepared in CD3CN in a glove box and the modified NMR tube is sealed with a crimp top cap and (new) septum seal. The tube is removed from the glove box and a baseline 19F NMR spectrum is recorded to establish the amount of background bifluoride ion present. (Background bifluoride ion arises from traces of water in the NMR solvent, salts, and from physisorbed water on the glass vessel.) The sample solution to be tested (either within or outside of the glove box) is then injected and a second 19F NMR spectrum is obtained. To illustrate and test the reproducibility of the single injection technique, a series of sample tubes was prepared, baseline spectra were gathered, and each tube was treated with a weighed amount of commercially obtained “dry” acetonitrile (measured [H2O] = 180 ppm). Figure 3 shows the result of a single injection water determination experiment involving the addition of 49 μg of water.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Single injection water determination by 19F NMR: bottom, background spectrum before the addition of “wet” CH3CN; top, spectrum collected after the injection of a CH3CN sample containing 49 μg of H2O.

To test the reproducibility and accuracy of the measurement technique, we measured water concentrations in 15 samples by conventional coulometric Karl Fischer titration and by 19F NMR spectroscopy. For the NMR procedure, the reproducibility was equal to that of Karl Fischer titration (± 3%) for samples involving measurement of 70 μg of water. Because the NMR method permitted sample preparation in an inert atmosphere glove box, sample handling errors for Karl Fischer titration were larger than those intrinsic to the NMR experiments. Notably, for “dry” THF we were able to measure easily and accurately the addition of 5 μg of water to a sample. In contrast, the detection limit for coulometric Karl Fischer titration using typical commercial equipment is 10 μg of added water.

Reasonable system stability is required for practical application of this water detection method. Since precise evaluation of water concentration relies on an accurate determination of bifluoride ion concentration, it is important to minimize any side reactions that might generate HF2. Control experiments showed that the PhI(OAc)2/TBAF reagent is stable in CD3CN solution for several hours, long enough for baseline and sample NMR spectra to be gathered. After this time, small amounts of cation decomposition produce detectable amounts of HF2. The long term stability of the system can be improved substantially if more robust cations, such as tetramethylammonium33 or hexamethylpiperidinium34 are used instead of TBA, although these salts prove to be less soluble than TBAF. Conveniently, the stable TBAF/PhI(OAc)2/TBABF4 salt mixture can be preweighed and sealed in the NMR tube so that deuterated solvent and liquid samples can be added through the septum subsequently (Figure 1, left). Like TBAF itself, the reagent mixture is stable in the solid state for months at −40 °C under an inert atmosphere.

Using typical instrumentation (Bruker Avance 400 MHz, QNP probe) and a single scan acquisition, the signal to noise ratio is sufficient to measure accurately the addition of 3 μg of water ([H2O] = 3 ppm in 1 mL solution). 19F NMR sensitivity is sufficient for submicrogram (100 ng) water detection ([H2O] = 0.1 ppm in 1 mL) with more sophisticated equipment (600 MHz spectrometer, dedicated H/F probe) and a longer acquisition time; however, we have found it a significant challenge to prepare TBAF/PhIF2/TBABF4 solutions that are sufficiently dry ([H2O] < 1 μg) to provide the low background necessary for submicrogram water detection.

The scope of the NMR aquametry technique is relatively broad, although it is limited by the basicity and nucleophilicity of weakly-coordinated fluoride ion. Halogenated alkanes and enolizable ketones and aldehydes are incompatible with these conditions, but measurement of trace water contamination in a wide range of alcohols and aprotic solvents (DMF, CH3CN, DMSO, benzene, toluene, ether, THF, pyridine) is possible. Although it may seem surprising that the water content in alcohols can be measured by this technique, the iodonium ligand exchange reaction of an alcohol for fluoride is strongly disfavored. It is only the formation of the I=O double bond that drives the dehydration reaction under basic conditions.

In conclusion, we have found that the TBAF/PhI(OAc)2/TBABF4 reagent combination removes water quantitatively from organic solvents and generates the easily detectable bifluoride ion in the process. 19F NMR spectroscopy of these solutions permits water concentration to be assessed sensitively and accurately for a relatively broad range of solvents. The aquametry technique is compatible with glove box and inert atmosphere work; it is relatively rapid, and it needs no calibration other than the acquisition of a baseline 19F NMR spectrum. Moreover, it can be performed with dried, commercially available salts and NMR solvents. The difluoro(aryl)-λ3-iodane-based procedure is a convenient alternative to Karl Fischer titration wherever NMR infrastructure is available.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001. Supporting Information Available.

Experimental procedures for sample preparaton and water determination. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Science Foundation (CHE 0717562) for support and the National Institutes of Health (RR016544-01) for infrastructure to conduct this research. We thank Dr. John Erickson and Novartis for the use of an electrochemical Karl Fischer titrator.

References

  • 1.Sun H, DiMagno SG. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:2050–2051. doi: 10.1021/ja0440497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sun H, DiMagno SG. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:2720–2725. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun H, DiMagno SG. Chem Commun. 2007:528–529. doi: 10.1039/b614368g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nussbaum R, Lischke D, Paxmann H, Wolf B. Chromatographia. 2000;51:119–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hogan JM, Engel RA, Stevenson HF. Anal Chem. 1970;42:249–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pasika WM, West AC., III Anal Chem. 1971;43:275–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Knight HS, Weiss FT. Anal Chem. 1962;34:749–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van de Voort FR, Sedman J, Cocciardi R, Juneau S. Talanta. 2007;72:289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li M, Pacey GE. Talanta. 1997;44:1949–1958. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(96)02111-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garrigues S, Gallignani M, de la Guardia M. Anal Chim Acta. 1993;281:259–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meeker RL, Critchfield FE, Bishop ET. Anal Chem. 1962;34:1510–1511. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Forbes JW. Anal Chem. 1962;34:1125–1128. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Streim HG, Boyce EA, Smith JR. Anal Chem. 1961;33:85–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Scholz E. Karl Fischer Titration. Springer; Berlin: 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mitchell J, Jr, Smith DM. Aquametry: A Treatise on Methods for the Determination of Water, Pt. 1. 2. Wiley; New York: 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Although 19F NMR spectroscopy has been used previously for aquametry, see reference 17) the fluorinated probe used earlier, hexafluoroacetone, offers clear disadvantages in terms of safety, sensitivity, chemical compatibility, and speed compared to the TBAF/PhI(OAc)2 reagent..
  • 17.Ho FFL, Kohler RR. Anal Chem. 1974;46:1302–1304. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhdankin VV. Science of Synthesis. 2007;31a:161–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sawaguchi M, Ayuba S, Hara S. Synthesis. 2002:1802–1803. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Naumann D, Ruether G. J Fluorine Chem. 1980;15:213–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruppert I. J Fluorine Chem. 1980;15:173–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sket B, Zupan M, Zupet P. Tetrahedron. 1984;40:1603–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gregorcic A, Zupan M. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1;1977:1446–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zupan M. Collect Czech Chem Commun. 1977;42:266–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gregorcic A, Zupan M. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1977;50:517–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zupan M, Pollak A. J Fluorine Chem. 1976;7:445–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zupan M, Pollak A. J Org Chem. 1976;41:2179–2182. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zupan M, Pollak A. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1;1976:1745–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bailly F, Barthen P, Breuer W, Frohn HJ, Giesen M, Helber G, Henkel G, Priwitzer A. Zeitschrift Anorg Allgem Chem. 2000;626:1406–1413. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ye C, Twamley B, Shreeve JnM. Org Lett. 2005;7:3961–3964. doi: 10.1021/ol051446t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lyalin VV, Orda VV, Alekseeva LA, Yagupol’skii LM. Zh Org Khim. 1970;6:329–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.The long T1 relaxation time for tetrafluoroborate necessitated single scan acquisitions. If better signal to noise ratios are required, fluorinated benzenes may be used as internal standards.
  • 33.Christe KO, Wilson WW, Wilson RD, Bau R, Feng JA. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:7619–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mahjoub AR, Zhang X, Seppelt K. Chem Eur J. 1995;1:261–5. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001. Supporting Information Available.

Experimental procedures for sample preparaton and water determination. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

RESOURCES