Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 23.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 10;342(6):381–389. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002103420603

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 1208 Patients Enrolled in the EDIC Study Who Were Evaluated after Four Years of Follow-up.*

Characteristic DCCT Treatment Group P
Value
CONVENTIONAL
(N=603)
INTENSIVE
(N=605)
At DCCT entry
Women (%) 47 48 0.69
Age (yr) 27±7 27±7 0.13
Duration of diabetes (yr) 5.6±4.1 5.9±4.2 0.18
Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) 9.0±1.6 9.0±1.6 0.41
At EDIC entry
Age (yr) 33±7 34±7 0.08
Duration of diabetes (yr) 11.7±4.8 12.1±4.9 0.11
DCCT follow-up (yr) 6.1±1.7 6.2±1.7 0.16
Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) 9.0±1.2 7.3±0.9 <0.001
Level of retinopathy (%) <0.001
None 18 29
Microaneurysms only 30 38
Mild nonproliferative retinopathy 30 22
Moderate or severe nonproliferative
retinopathy
22 11
Photocoagulation during DCCT (%)
Scatter, for retinopathy 4 2 0.018
Focal, for macular edema 5 2 0.038
Nephropathy at EDIC year 3 or 4 (%)
Albumin excretion >28 μg/min 13 7 0.002
Albumin excretion >208 μg/min 3 2 0.14
Creatinine clearance <70 ml/min/
1.73 m2
1 2 0.63
Treatment at EDIC year 4 (%)
Continuous subcutaneous insulin in-
fusion (pump) or multiple daily
injections
75 95 <0.001
Self-monitoring of blood glucose
≥4 times per day
40 45 0.064
*

Plus-minus values are means ±SD. EDIC denotes Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications, and DCCT Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

The base-line data in the EDIC study were the same as the data at the end of the DCCT.

The results for nephropathy include 1302 EDIC participants (649 from the former conventional-therapy group and 653 from the former intensive-therapy group).