Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Sep;17(9):2436–2444. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0399

Table 3.

Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between genital talc use and ovarian cancer risk in the New England Case-Control Study (NECC) and the Nurses' Health Study (NHS)

NECC
NHS
Pooled
Cases (%) Ctrls (%) RR (95% CI) Cases (%) Ctrls (%) RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI)
Total epithelial ovarian cancer:
N* 1175 1202 210 600
Regular genital talc use (>=once/week)
No 859 (73.2) 957 (79.7) 1.00 (ref.) 138 (70.8) 414 (76.0) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
Yes 314 (26.8) 244 (20.3) 1.40 (1.15, 1.70) 57 (29.2) 131 (24.0) 1.24 (0.83, 1.83) 1.36 (1.14, 1.63)
Frequency of genital talc use
Never 832 (70.9) 916 (76.3) 1.00 (ref.) 120 (61.5) 352 (64.6) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
<once/week 27 (2.3) 41 (3.4) 0.72 (0.43, 1.19) 18 (9.2) 62 (11.4) 0.98 (0.54, 1.79) 0.82 (0.55, 1.20)
1-6 times/week 123 (10.5) 96 (8.0) 1.33 (1.00, 1.79) 22 (11.3) 61 (11.2) 1.01 (0.57, 1.79) 1.26 (0.97, 1.63)
Daily 191 (16.3) 148 (12.3) 1.41 (1.10, 1.79) 35 (18.0) 70 (12.8) 1.44 (0.88, 2.37) 1.41 (1.14, 1.76)
P-trend§ 0.002 0.18 <0.001
Serous invasive ovarian cancer:
N* 450 1202 93 263
Regular genital talc use (>=once/week)
No 310 (69.0) 957 (79.7) 1.00 (ref.) 60 (68.2) 177 (73.8) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
Yes 139 (31.0) 244 (20.3) 1.62 (1.26, 2.09) 28 (31.8) 63 (26.3) 1.48 (0.82, 2.68) 1.60 (1.26, 2.02)
Frequency of genital talc use
Never 299 (66.6) 916 (76.3) 1.00 (ref.) 54 (61.4) 151 (62.9) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
<once/week 11 (2.4) 41 (3.4) 0.65 (0.32, 1.33) 6 (6.8) 26 (10.8) 0.79 (0.29, 2.11) 0.70 (0.39, 1.24)
1-6 times/week 56 (12.5) 96 (8.0) 1.56 (1.08, 2.26) 12 (13.6) 25 (10.4) 1.64 (0.71, 3.79) 1.58 (1.12, 2.21)
Daily 83 (18.5) 148 (12.3) 1.61 (1.18, 2.20) 16 (18.2) 38 (15.8) 1.34 (0.65, 2.76) 1.56 (1.17, 2.08)
P-trend§ <0.001 0.29 <0.001
*

Frequencies do not add up to total N due to missing data on talc use

Unconditional (NECC) and conditional (NHS) logistic regression adjusted for age, study center (NECC only), duration of oral contraceptive use (months), parity (continuous), tubal ligation, body mass index (kg/m2, continuous), and duration of postmenopausal hormone use (months)

P-values for tests for heterogeneity comparing the NECC and NHS results were all >0.38

§

Weighted by the midpoint of each category of genital talc use frequency and calculated using the Wald test