TABLE 4.
Distribution of spa types by city in Chinaa
| City | Total no. of isolates | % (no.) of isolates of the following spa type:
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t030 | t037 | t002 | Other | ||
| Beijing | 236 | 76.7 (181) | 2.5 (6) | 14.9 (35) | 5.9 (14) |
| Changchun | 15 | − (12) | − (1) | − (2) | |
| Dalian | 30 | 10.0 (3) | 33.3 (10) | 53.4 (16) | 3.3 (1) |
| Guangzhou | 50 | 38.0 (19) | 44.0 (22) | 8.0 (4) | 10 (5) |
| Hangzhou | 58 | 46.6 (27) | 34.5 (20) | 10.3 (6) | 8.6 (5) |
| Nanjing | 14 | − (8) | − (5) | − (1) | |
| Nanning | 8 | − (2) | − (5) | − (1) | |
| Qingdao | 30 | 63.4 (19) | 13.3 (4) | 23.3 (7) | |
| Shanghai | 103 | 9.7 (10) | 74.8 (77) | 15.5 (16) | |
| Shenyang | 54 | 38.9 (21) | 44.4 (24) | 16.7 (9) | |
| Shenzhen | 17 | − (2) | − (13) | − (1) | − (1) |
| Urumchi | 14 | − (5) | − (6) | − (2) | − (1) |
| Wuhan | 40 | 82.5 (33) | 7.5 (3) | 10.0 (4) | |
| Xi'an | 33 | 69.7 (23) | 24.2 (8) | 6.1 (2) | |
a
The prevalence of spa types was not calculated in cities where the total number of isolates was less than 20.