Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 17;53(2):662–669. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00907-08

TABLE 3.

Discrimination criteria between PK modelsa

Day Model description Mean ECV Mean AIC Mean r2 Mean residual variability (%) Mean CL/F (liters/h) Mean Vss/F (liters)
1 2 CPT, ka1 −6.3 3.4 0.940 7.2
2 CPT, ka1, 2 ABS peaks −4.6 10.7 0.913 6.7
2 CPT, ka1, ka2 −9.5 3.0 0.993 2.7 45.6 2,629
3 CPT, ka1 −2.4 15.2 0.930 8.0
2 CPT, ka1, ka2, baseline Vss −6 10.1 0.992 4.3
2 CPT, ka1, ka2, saturable elimination −2.3 19.5 0.927 7.3
2 CPT, ka1, ka2, baseline Vss, saturable elimination −2.3 19.4 0.928 6.9
21 2 CPT, ka1 16.9 49.8 0.911 17.1
2 CPT, ka1, 2 ABS peaks 12.7 45.4 0.941 11.1
2 CPT, ka1, ka2 8.9 39.8 0.960 7.2 22.6 1,494
3 CPT, ka1 12.8 45.7 0.862 16.8
2 CPT, ka1, ka2, baseline Vss 10.9 43.8 0.949 10
2 CPT, ka1, ka2, saturable elimination 17.2 58.3 0.952 17.5
2 CPT, ka1, ka2, baseline Vss, saturable elimination 20.2 64.4 0.913 20.6
a

The selected model is in bold type. CPT, compartments; ABS, absorption; ECV, estimator criteria value.