Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb;23(2):382–395. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-095901

TABLE 2.

Effect of BM donor genotype on regenerated muscle fiber size and area of regeneration and residual necrosis

Donor BM → host CSA (μm2)
Area of regeneration/necrosis: % TA (CTX)
Regenerated fibers (CTX) Mature fibers (NS)
WT → WT (HC) 1463 ± 34 2605 ± 105* 81 ± 6
WT → CCR2−/− 1367 ± 57 2665 ± 39* 83 ± 9
CCR2−/−CCR2−/− (HC) 908 ± 65 2855 ± 180* 86 ± 7
CCR2−/− → WT 940 ± 52 2412 ± 148* 83 ± 7

Regenerated (centrally located nuclei) and mature (peripherally located nuclei) muscle fiber cross-sectional area and the area of muscle regeneration and residual necrosis were measured in a TA muscle specimen obtained at 21 days after CTX or NS injection. HC mice were used to control for the effect of BM transplantation. Data presented as means ± se; n = 4–7 mice/group. 

*

P ≤ 0.009 vs. regenerated fibers. 

P < 0.001 vs. WT → WT (HC). 

P < 0.001 vs. CCR2−/−CCR2−/− (HC). There were no significant differences among the four groups for mature fiber size or the area of regeneration and residual necrosis.