Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan-Feb;2(1):25–33.

Table 4.

Rectal cancer pooled analysis: 5-year relapse rates by treatment method for intermediate-risk, moderately high-risk, and high-risk patients.

Risk group/TN stage S + CT(%) RT + bolus CT*(%) RT + PVI CT(%) RT + bolus CT(%)
Local relapse
Intermediate risk
T1-2N1 (n = 355) 5 6 5 6

T3N0 (n = 1,058) 11 10 5 8

Moderately high risk
T1-2N2 (n = 226) 0 13 11 9

T3N1 (n = 881) 17 12 9 10

T4N0 (n = 111) 20 (10) 18 10 11
High risk
T3N2 (n = 929) 15 17 11 15

T4N1 (n = 62) 43 (7) 0 18 22

T4N2 (n = 108) 0 (4) 22 33 16

Distant relapse
Intermediate risk
T1-2N1 (n = 355) 16 14 15 14

T3N0 (n = 1,058) 18 20 13 18

Moderately high risk
T1-2N2 (n = 226) 57 40 61 28

T3N1 (n = 881) 37 35 30 33

T4N0 (n = 111) 20 (10) 27 59 25

High risk
T3N2 (n = 929) 46 53 30 41

T4N1 (n = 62) 43 (7) 40 36 34

T4N2 (n = 108) 75 (4) 78 22 53

Modified from Gunderson et al12

*

NCCTG and NSABP trials

INT 0114

Number of patients at risk

Abbreviations: CT = chemotherapy; NCCTG = North Central Cancer Treatment Group; NSABP = National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project; PVI = protracted venous infusion; RT = radiotherapy; S = surgery; TN = N substage within T stage