Table 3.
Total Leaf Area analysis of the segregating esk1-6 T3 population
| Control | Water deficit | |
| Heterozygous/wt | NS (4.42/3.82) | NS (2.81/2.97) |
| Heterozygous/homozygous | S*** (4.42/2.99) | S*** (2.81/1.52) |
| Wt/homozygous | S* (3.82/2.99) | S*** (2.97/1.52) |
Monitored control and mild water deficit stress (averaged determination) was applied to a segregating T3 population of esk1-6 mutant plants (203 individuals). A one factor ANOVA was performed to test the significance of the difference in TLA between heterozygous vs. wild type, heterozygous vs. homozygous and wild type vs. homozygous genotypes. TLA values (cm2) for each genotype for each treatment are given in brackets. NS: non significant; S*: significant with 0.05 > p-value > 0.01; S***: significant with p-value < 0.001.