Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 6;5(2):e1000373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000373

Table 2. Twenty-five schizophrenia candidate genes were checked for association with schizophrenia in a cohort of 879 cases and 864 controls.

Gene Previously associated SNPs present on Illumina chip Previously associated SNP represented by an LD proxy on Illumina chip Closest proxy (r2 in CEU) SNP replication p OR excluded Lowest p #SNPs tested in gene Gene-wide correction Set-wide correction Genome-wide correction
AKT1 NA NA 0.416 4 1 1 1
CAPON/NOS1AP NA NA 0.033 45 1 1 1
CHRNA7 NA NA 0.067 14 0.94 1 1
COMT rs4680 0.94 1.05 0.090 12 1 1 1
DAO NA NA 0.288 9 1 1 1
DAOA(G72) rs3916971 rs778293 0.09 1.23 0.085 10 0.85 1 1
DISC1 rs2295959 rs3738401 0.621 1.14 0.082 64 1 1 1
DRD2 rs6277 rs6275 rs754672 (0.81) rs2242592(1) 0.753 1.12 0.033 14 0.46 1 1
DRD3 rs6280 0.491 1.15 0.168 13 1 1 1
DTNBP1 rs760761 rs1474605 (1) 0.948 1.05 0.107 18 1 1 1
ERBB4 rs7598440 rs707284 rs839523 rs4673628 rs839517 (0.86) rs1851169(1) 0.313 1.18 0.012 181 1 1 1
FEZ1 NA NA 0.002 13 0.026 1 1
GAD1 NA NA 0.289 9 1 1 1
GRIK4 NA NA 0.028 54 1 1 1
GRM3 rs1468412 rs2237562 (1) 0.495 1.15 0.075 27 1 1 1
HTR2A rs6313 rs4941573 (1) 0.498 1.15 0.042 21 0.88 1 1
MRDS1(OFCC1) NA NA 0.017 36 0.61 1 1
MUTED NA NA 0.035 31 1 1 1
NOTCH4 rs175174 rs11089328(0.93) 0.872 1.09 0.0017 28 0.048 1 1
NRG1 NA NA 0.012 157 1 1 1
PPP3CC NA NA 0.228 6 1 1 1
PRODH2 NA NA 0.163 7 1 1 1
RGS4 rs951439 rs6678136 (1) 0.186 1.20 0.186 2 0.372 1 1
TNF NA NA 0.248 5 1 1 1
ZDHHC8 rs175174 rs11089328 (0.93) 0.872 1.09 0.794 2 1 1 1

Displayed are (1) gene symbol; (2) previously associated candidate SNPs in that gene, included in the Illumina 300K chip; (3) previously associated candidate SNPs in that gene, not included in the Illumina 300K chip but can be represented by a LD proxy in the chip; (4) the closest proxy SNP present on the Illumina 300K chip for column 3; (5) the lowest p value for SNP-specific (column 2 and 4) replication; (6) Maximum odds ratio (allelic OR under multiplicative genetic model) at the previously-implicated locus, based on observed p value at this SNP or a proxy. A real odds ratio of this size is expected to produce a p value as high as the one observed only 5% of the time, based on the power formulae of Chapman et al [59]; For detailed review on the previous reports of these candidate genes and SNPs see reference [30]; (7) lowest p value of all the HumanHap300 SNPs located in that gene (lowest p); (8) number of SNPs tested in each gene; (9) the lowest p value corrected for all the SNPs tested in that gene (gene-wide correction); (10) the lowest p value corrected for all the SNPs in the 25 candidate genes (set-wide correction); (11) the lowest p value after correction for all HumanHap300 SNPs tested (genome-wide correction).