Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Stat Plan Inference. 2009 Mar 1;139(1):711–721. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.09.015

Table 1.

Comparison of Multireader Standard Errors on θ̂A

ρdr,sm = 0.33 Multireader Standard Errors of θ̂A
θA raters (m, n) Lower Bound Exponential Binormal Upper Bound
0.70 3 (50,100) 0.0306 0.0320 0.0340 0.0482
(100,100) 0.0269 0.0274 0.0283 0.0341
(200,300) 0.0169 0.0172 0.0181 0.0241
0.70 6 (50,100) 0.0274 0.0286 0.0304 0.0431
(100,100) 0.0240 0.0245 0.0253 0.0305
(200,300) 0.0151 0.0153 0.0162 0.0215
0.70 9 (50,100) 0.0262 0.0273 0.0291 0.0412
(100,100) 0.0230 0.0234 0.0242 0.0291
(200,300) 0.0144 0.0147 0.0155 0.0206
0.80 3 (50,100) 0.0257 0.0264 0.0303 0.0421
(100,100) 0.0222 0.0233 0.0257 0.0298
(200,300) 0.0140 0.0143 0.0162 0.0210
0.80 6 (50,100) 0.0230 0.0236 0.0270 0.0376
(100,100) 0.0199 0.0208 0.0230 0.0266
(200,300) 0.0125 0.0128 0.0145 0.0188
0.80 9 (50,100) 0.0220 0.0225 0.0259 0.0360
(100,100) 0.0190 0.0199 0.0220 0.0254
(200,300) 0.0120 0.0123 0.0139 0.0180
0.90 3 (50,100) 0.0175 0.0182 0.0223 0.0316
(100,100) 0.0149 0.0168 0.0195 0.0223
(200,300) 0.0094 0.0101 0.0121 0.0158
0.90 6 (50,100) 0.0156 0.0162 0.0199 0.0282
(100,100) 0.0133 0.0150 0.0174 0.0199
(200,300) 0.0084 0.0090 0.0108 0.0141
0.90 9 (50,100) 0.0149 0.0155 0.0191 0.0270
(100,100) 0.0127 0.0144 0.0166 0.0191
(200,300) 0.0081 0.0086 0.0103 0.0135