Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug;19(4-2):360–369. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.06.001

Table 1.

Comparison of JAK/STAT RNAi screens

Experimental condition Baeg Müller
Biological differences
 Pathway stimulation Endogenous Upd2 Ectopically expressed Upd-GFP
 Cell line S2-NP Kc167



Screening procedure
 Coverage of library 21,300 dsRNAs 20,026 dsRNAs
 Screening reporter 10xStat92E-luciferase (FL) containing five tandem repeats of a 441bp fragment from the socs36E enhancer (each with four potential Stat92E binding sites) p6x2xDrafLuc containing six repeats of a 165 bp fragment from the raf promoter (each with two Stat92E binding sites)
 Co-reporter pAct-RL pAct-RL
 RNA concentration per well 80 ng/well 500 ng/well
 Cells seeded per well of a 384-well plate 40,000 15,000
 Transfection of reporter Per well In batch
 dsRNA uptake Transfection Bathing + SID-1 dsRNA trans-porter
 Time for RNAi 4 days 5 days
 Replicate datasets Two Two



Data processing
 Data normalisation Fold SD from the plate mean of FL/RL ratio for each plate Fold MAD from the plate median of FL channel for each plate
 Selection of positive regulators <2 SD below plate mean <2 MAD below plate median
 Selection of negative regulators >3 SD above plate mean >2 MAD above plate median
 Exclusion of genes Genes not annotated by BDGP, ribosomal proteins, proteins involved in RNA processing and translation Previously published cell viability modifiers, treatments with high variability between replicates, treatments with z-scores >2 or <2 in the RL channel, genes with phenotypes in other screens
 False-positive rate (determined by re-screens of primary hits) 29% 15%
 Human homologs of hits 73% 74%