TABLE 6.
Effects of control region, carbon source, and Crp on Φ(napF-lacZ) expression in the absence of nitrate
Straina | Control region alterationb
|
crp allelec | LacZ sp act (Miller units)d
|
Catabolite repression (fold) | Crp activation (fold)
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | P2 | Fructose | Glucose | Fructose | Glucose | |||
VJS5516 | + | + | + | 1,120 | 600 | 1.9 | 7.0 | 3.3 |
VJS11445 | + | + | - | 160 | 180 | 0.9 | ||
VJS7444 | + | - | + | 680 | 560 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 2.2 |
VJS11447 | + | - | - | 170 | 250 | 0.7 | ||
VJS7443 | - | + | + | 540 | 150 | 3.6 | 6.0 | 1.9 |
VJS11446 | - | + | - | 90 | 80 | 1.1 |
Genotype: narQ+ narP+ narX+ narL215::Tn10 λΦ(napF-lacZ) [Δ146] (Table 1).
Control region alteration in Φ(napF-lacZ) construct (Fig. 1).
+, crp+; -, Δcrp-45.
Strains were cultured anaerobically to the early exponential phase in MOPS defined medium supplemented with 0.2% acid-hydrolyzed casein. The carbon source was added (40 mM) as indicated.