TABLE 2.
Reproducibility of method B for NoV detection for six naturally contaminated samples, each extracted three times
Sample | Genogroup I NoV
|
Genogroup II NoV
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rRT-PCR efficiency (%)a | Concnb (RNA copies/g DT)
|
rRT-PCR efficiency (%)a | Concnb (RNA copies/g DT)
|
|||||
Assay 1 | Assay 2 | Assay 3 | Assay 1 | Assay 2 | Assay 3 | |||
1 | 97.0 ± 1.7 | 330 | +DLc | 100.7 ± 0.6 | 16 | 43 | 38 | |
2 | 95.6 ± 2.5 | 100.9 ± 2.6 | +DL | |||||
3 | 94.8 ± 4.3 | 98.2 ± 5.2 | ||||||
4 | 96.7 ± 1.9 | 250 | 102.4 ± 0.3 | 110 | +DL | 88 | ||
5 | 97.6 ± 1.7 | 840 | 99.7 ± 3.9 | 190 | 58 | |||
6 | 94.8 ± 5.0 | 910 | 100.1 ± 1.8 | 110 | +DL | 53 |
rRT-PCR efficiency was calculated based on coamplification of genogroup I and II RNA external controls with pure and 10-fold-diluted nucleic acid extract.
The genogroup I or II NoV concentration was calculated based on CT values obtained for pure and 10-fold-diluted nucleic acid extract and the corresponding standard curve.
+DL, positive sample, but the level was too close to the limit of detection for quantification.