TABLE 6.
Comparison between experimentally determined and calculated percentages of naphthol isomers produced by wild-type ToMO and ToMO mutant proteins
| ToMO variant or mutation | Binding energya (kcal/mol) for:
|
Calculated %b of:
|
Experimentally determined %c of:
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EN‡α | EN‡β1 | EN‡β2 | α-N | β-N produced by EN‡β1 | β-N produced by EN‡β2 | α-N | β-N | |
| Wild type | −38.66 | −31.08 | −35.49 | 99.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 87 | 13 |
| F176I | −36.32 | −32.88 | −34.10 | 97.4 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 57 | 43 |
| F176L | −37.29 | −28.65 | −34.17 | 99.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 57 | 43 |
| I100A | −38.58 | −33.37 | −36.10 | 98.5 | 0.02 | 1.5 | 53 | 47 |
| I100V | −38.02 | −30.30 | −35.91 | 97.3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 81 | 19 |
Total binding energy for the complex ToMO variant-naphthalene analogue of CCI 10 (EN‡α), ToMO variant-naphthalene analogue of CCI 12 (EN‡β1), or ToMO variant-naphthalene analogue of CCI 13 (EN‡β2).
α- and β-N, α- and β-naphthol.
Error, <1%.