Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 16;34(2):322–329. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm149

Table 1.

Neuroimaging Studies in Clinical High-Risk Populations

Article Sample Size Measure Findings
Cross-sectional studies
    Phillips et al19 UHR-P = 20 Volume of hippocampus and whole brain UHR vs CTRL: UHR ↓ hippocampus bilaterally
UHR-NP = 40 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: UHR-P ↑ left hippocampus
CTRL = 139
    Pantelis et al35 UHR-P = 23 VBM of GM UHR-P vs UHR-NP: UHR-P ↓ GM in right medial temporal lobe, STG, temporal pole, inferior frontal gyrus, VLPFC, and basal ganglia
UHR-NP = 52
    Wood et al23 UHR-P = 6 1H MRS in left medial temporal and left prefrontal (NAA/Cr and TMA/Cr) UHR vs CTRL: UHR ↑ NAA/Cr and TMA/Cr in prefrontal voxel (interpreted as ↓ Cr)
UHR-NP = 24 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: no significant differences
CTRL = 21
    Yücel et al41 UHR-P = 21 Presence or absence of the PCS UHR vs CTRL: UHR ↓ PCS frequency in left hemisphere, ↑ number of CS interruptions
UHR-NP = 42 Interruptions of the CS UHR-P vs UHR-NP: no significant differences
CTRL = 75
    Walterfang et al55 UHR-P = 23 VBM of WM UHR-P vs UHR-NP: UHR-P ↑ WM in left superior frontooccipital fasciculus (near premotor cortex) and left superior longitudinal fasciculus (near frontal operculum)
UHR-NP = 52
    Garner et al66 UHR-P = 31 Pituitary volume UHR vs CTRL: not reported
UHR-NP = 63 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: UHR-P ↑ pituitary volume
CTRL = 49
    Jessen et al24 UHR-P = 3 1H MRS in left frontal, left STG, and bilateral ACC UHR vs CTRL: UHR ↓ NAA in frontal and ACC voxels
UHR-NP = 16 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: UHR-P ↓ NAA/TMA in ACC voxel
CTRL = 24
    Velakoulis et al20 UHR-P = 39 Volume of hippocampus, amygdala and whole brain UHR vs CTRL: UHR ↓ whole-brain volume
UHR-NP = 96 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: no significant differences
CTRL = 87
    Borgwardt et al27 UHR-P = 12 VBM of GM UHR vs CTRL: UHR ↑ GM in bilateral parahippocampal, fusiform, and medial occipital gyri, plus the posterior temporal, inferior parietal and postcentral cortex, the red nucleus and thalamus, and the right supramarginal gyrus
UHR-NP = 23 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: UHR-P ↓ GM in right insula and STG, ↑ GM in
CTRL = 22
    Berger et al53 UHR-P = 39 Lateral ventricular volume UHR vs CTRL: no significant differences
UHR-NP = 96 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: no significant differences
CTRL = 87
    Fornito et al (unpublished data) UHR-P = 35 ACC volume, thickness, and surface area UHR vs CTRL: not reported
UHR-NP = 35 UHR-P vs UHR-NP: UHR-P ↓ thickness in bilateral rostral limbic ACC
CTRL = 33
Longitudinal studies
    Pantelis et al35 UHR-P = 10 VBM of GM UHR-P ↓ bilaterally in cingulate and in left medial temporal, orbitofrontal, and cerebellar regions
UHR-NP = 11 UHR-NP ↓ in left cerebellum
No significant group-by-time interaction
    Walterfang et al55 UHR-P = 10 VBM of WM UHR-P ↓ deep left parietal WM near frontooccipital fasciculus and left occipital WM subadjacent to calcarine cortex, ↑ posterior cerebellum bilaterally
UHR-NP = 11 UHR-NP ↑ left posterior cerebellum and subadjacent to right inferior parietal lobule
No significant group-by-time interaction
    Sun et al57 UHR-P = 12 VBM of cortical surface motion UHR-P ↓ right prefrontal region compared with UHR-NP
UHR-NP = 23

Note: UHR-P, ultra high-risk psychotic; UHR-NP, ultra high-risk nonpsychotic; CTRL, control; VBM, voxel-based morphometry; GM, gray matter; STG, superior temporal gyrus; VLPFC, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; NAA, N-acetylaspartate; Cr, creatine and phosphocreatine; TMA, trimethylamine; PCS, paracingulate sulcus; CS, cingulate sulcus; WM, white matter; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex.