Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Mar 16;129(14):4124–4125. doi: 10.1021/ja069245n

Table 2.

Effect of SET Reagent, Ligand, and Solventa

graphic file with name nihms-63734-t0004.jpg
Ent SET Reagent
(mol%)		 Ligand NaNO2
(equiv)		 Solv Yld
(%)b 		ee
(%)c
1 Cp2FeBF4 (100) 10b 0 THF 87 80
2 Cp2FeBF4 (50) 10b 0 THF 40 74
3 FeCl3 (100) 10b 0 THF 4 ndd
4 FeCl3 (100) 10b 0 DMF 74 72
5e FeCl3 (30) 10b 0.3 DMF 82 75
6e FeCl3 (10) 10b 0.3 DMF 83 72
7e FeCl3 (10) 10c 0.3 DMF 75 5
8e FeCl3 (10) 10d 0.3 DMF 64 46
9e FeCl3 (10) 10e 0.3 DMF 26 0
10e FeCl3 (10) 10f 0.3 DMF 33 17
a

For reaction conditions, see Supporting Information.

b

Isolated yield.

c

Determined by chiral HPLC.

d

Not determined.

e

2 equiv of TEMPO was used.