Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Parasitol. 2008 Aug 12;39(3):315–326. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.07.007

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effect of PF1 under current-clamp. (A) Representative trace showing change in membrane potential record of somatic muscle cells in current clamp before, during and after application of PF1 (1 μM). (B) Bar chart of the mean ± standard error of the mean membrane potential responses observed from different preparations. There was a significant hyperpolarization after PF1 application under all experimental conditions; the comparisons were made between the membrane potential before and after application of PF1 under different conditions. The comparison of responses between different conditions was not significant. PF1 (1 μM, n = 6) −5.0 ± 0.8 mV; PF1 (10 μM, n = 6) −6.25 ± 0.7 mV; PF1 (1 μM, n = 5) in the presence of cobalt (6 mM) −6.4 ± 1.0 mV and PF1 (1 μM, n = 10) in presence of 4-AP (5 mM) −3.2 ± 0.4 mV, respectively. (paired t-test, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).