Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Parasitol. 2008 Aug 12;39(3):315–326. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.07.007

Fig. 5 — Lack of effect of PF1 (1 μM) in presence of cobalt. (A) Representative traces showing the effect of PF1 (1 μM) on voltage-activated outward currents in cobalt-APF. There was no change in the voltage-activated (outward) potassium currents during and after PF1 application. Recordings were made in cobalt-Ringer solution no potassium channel blockers. (B) Current–voltage plot of the mean (O) potassium currents before, during and after application of PF1 (1 μM). Control: PF1 (1 μM): Post-wash: (C) There was no change in mean potassium current during and after PF1 (1 μM) application in presence of cobalt (paired t-test, n = 6, ^**P ≤ 0.01, ^*P ≤ 0.05).

Inline graphic — Lack of effect of PF1 (1 μM) in presence of cobalt. (A) Representative traces showing the effect of PF1 (1 μM) on voltage-activated outward currents in cobalt-APF. There was no change in the voltage-activated (outward) potassium currents during and after PF1 application. Recordings were made in cobalt-Ringer solution no potassium channel blockers. (B) Current–voltage plot of the mean (O) potassium currents before, during and after application of PF1 (1 μM). Control: PF1 (1 μM): Post-wash: (C) There was no change in mean potassium current during and after PF1 (1 μM) application in presence of cobalt (paired t-test, n = 6, ^**P ≤ 0.01, ^*P ≤ 0.05).