Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2009 Feb;61(2):364–371. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21850

Table 1. Calculated qMT and DTI parameters for mice optic nerve.

Calculated qMT and DTI parameters for respective ROIs (Each pixel was fitted individually and these results were then averaged over the ROIs). We chose the whole optic nerve (excluding boundary pixels), which contains 12-20 pixels, as the ROI for each injured and uninjured optic nerve. The positioning of those ROIs were based on the relative anisotropy maps which have the most contrast between optic nerve and surrounding tissues, as shown in Figure 1. The p value (for the comparison of left injured against right uninjured) represents the statistically significant difference calculated by t-test.

left (injured) Right (uninjured) p value
qMT pool size ratio control 0.102±0.011 0.099±0.014 0.70
shiverer 0.069±0.004 0.076±0.007 0.07
fast rate ( s-1) control 24±8 24±9 0.94
shiverer 25±3 27±10 0.82
slow rate ( s-1) control 0.92±0.09 0.92±0.08 0.90
shiverer 0.89±0.04 0.87±0.05 0.50
DTI radial diffusivity
( μm2 / ms )
control 0.17±0.03 0.17±0.03 0.90
shiverer 0.22±0.02 0.22±0.04 0.84
axial diffusivity
( μm2 / ms )
control 0.49±0.09 0.67±0.07 0.006
shiverer 0.53±0.05 0.73±0.06 0.0002
relative anisotropy control 0.53±0.06 0.67±0.04 0.0011
shiverer 0.49±0.04 0.63±0.05 0.0005