Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec;154(3):332–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03774.x

Table 3.

Individual and combined diagnostic performance of anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibody assays.

Assays Sensitivity (95% CI)*, % Specificity (95% CI)*, % PPV (95% CI)*, % NPV (95% CI)*, %
APS group
 aCL 83·8 (72·4–92·0) 87·8 (78·2–94·2) 85·2 (73·8–93·0) 86·6(76·8–93·4)
 aβ2GPI 69·4 (56·4–80·4) 96·0 (88·6–99·2) 93·4 (82·2–98·6) 78·8 (69·0–86·8)
 aCL and β2GPI 87·0 (76·2–94·2) 85·2 (75·0–92·4) 83·0 (71·8–91·2) 88·8 (79·0–95·0)
 aPL Aesku 92·0 (82·2–97·4) 70·2 (61·0–81·6) 72·2 (61·0–81·6) 91·2 (80·8–97·0)
RPL group
 aCL 3·0 (0·4–10·6) 87·8 (78·2–94·2) 18·2 (2·2–51·8) 50·4 (41·4–59·4)
 aβ2GPI 4·6 (1·0–12·8) 96·0 (88·6–99·2) 50·0 (11·8–88·2) 53·0 (44·2–61·6)
 aCL and β2GPI 6·0 (1·6–14·8) 85·2 (75·0–92·4) 26·6 (7·8–55·2) 50·4 (41·4–59·4)
 aPL Aesku 39·4 (27·6–52·2) 70·2 (58·6–80·4) 54·2 (39·2–68·6) 56·6 (45·8–66·8)
*

95% CI for the calculated individual and combined sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPV) for the recommended (without LA) and all non-recommended aPL assays in the anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) groups compared with the healthy blood donor (HBD) and women with histories of successful pregnancies (WSP) controls.

Denotes significant differences (P < 0·05) between the sensitivities of aCL or anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) or aCL and β2GPI versus all aPL Aesku.

Shows significant differences (P < 0·05) in the PPV between aCL or aCL and β2GPI versus all aPL Aesku (RPL groups only).

CI, confidence interval.