Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jan;15(1 Suppl):162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.10.014

Selected studies of Novel agents as secondary therapy in CGVHD

Study Novel Therapy Sample size Response Survival(follow up)
Lopez et al.(15) MMF 24 75% 85% (2 years)
Baudard et al.(5) MMF 15 69% 80% (19.5 months)
Mookerjee et al.(16) MMF 26 46% -
Ratanatharathorn et al.(17) Rituximab 8 50% 100% (27–99 months)
Cutler et al.(6) Rituximab 21 70% -
Couriel et al.(7) Sirolimus 35 63% 41% (2 years)
Jurado et al.(18) Sirolimus 47 81% 57% (3 years)
Flowers et al (randomized trial of ECP vs. no ECP)(9) ECP 95 Improvement in skin score 14.5% in ECP arm vs 10.4% in non ECP arm (NS) 98% in ECP arm, 94% in non ECP arm (12 weeks)
Couriel et al.(8) ECP 71 61% 53% (1 year)
Gilman et al.(12) Hydroxychloroquine 40 53% 75% in responders, 40% in nonresponders(30 months)
Akpek et al.(10) Pulsed steroids 61 75% 81% (2 years)
Jacobsohn et al.(11) Pentostatin 58 55% 70% (2 years)
Browne et al.(19) Thalidomide 37 38% 41% (2years)
Parker et al.(14) Thalidomide 80 20% 53% (2.7 years)