Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Nov 19;33(2):273–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00830.x

Table 2.

Extinction Responding in Group-Housed and Socially Isolated Long- Evans Ratsa

Group Housedb Socially Isolated Statisticsc
Ethanol Self-Administration
Total Lever Responses 123.3 ± 9.1 127.8 ± 12.5 n.s.
Response Bouts 9.2 ± 0.9 9.1 ± 0.6 n.s.
1st Bout Responses 15.7 ± 4.6 33.4 ± 8.9 n.s. (P<0.1)
1st Bout Response Rate (press/min) 28.5 ±4.4 54.7 ± 11.4 t=2.13, P<0.05
Response Latency (sec)
26.4 ± 6.1
45.2 ± 6.2
t=2.09, P<0.05
Sucrose Self-Administration
Total Lever Responses 141.8 ± 9.6 141.0 ± 20.0 n.s.
Response Bouts 4.2 ± 0.8 4.8 ± 0.9 n.s.
1st Bout Responses 30.3 ± 11.9 24.7 ± 8.3 n.s.
1st Bout Response Rate (press/min) 5.6 ± 0.3 6.1 ± 0.3 n.s.
Response Latency (sec) 40.5 ± 9.6 36.4 ± 9.2 n.s.
a

Extinction responding was measured with two separate individual trials separated by a week of standard self administration. Averages for individual animals were used for the group comparisons.

b

For the ethanol self-administration study, n=11 for the group housed animals and n=16 for the socially isolated animals (see text). For the sucrose self-administration study, n= 11 for both the group housed and socially isolated animals.

c

Statistical comparisons were made using Student's t-test. P<0.05 was considered significant. “n.s.” = not significant