Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Nov 19;33(2):273–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00830.x

Table 3.

Effects of Juvenile Housing Environment on Operant Sucrose Self-Administrationa

Group Housedb Socially Isolatedb t-test
Response Latencyc (sec) 42.3±10.9 39.4±7.0 n.s.
Response Rate (press/sec) 11.5±2.0 9.8±1.6 n.s.
Response Bouts (per session) 3.1±0.3 3.7±0.5 n.s.
Lick Latency (sec) 1.4±0.2 1.1±0.1 n.s.
Lick Rate (licks/min) 133.7±10.5 138.4±9.0 n.s.
Number of Licks (per session) 2253±172 2367±168 n.s.
Consumption (g/kg) 1.07±0.08 1.10±0.07 n.s.
a

All animals were required to complete 30 lever presses to gain access to a 3% sucrose solution. When this response requirement was completed, animals had free access to a sipper tube for 20minutes (Samson & Chappell, 2001).

b

group housed, n=11; socially isolated, n=11

c

Data represents mean session data collected over the first two ‘baseline’ weeks (a total of 10 operant sessions; see text).