Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008 Dec;6(6):805–824. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.6.805

Table 5.

Cefepime MICs interpretative breakpoints: comparison between CLSI and EUCAST criteria

Organism CLSI (MIC, mg/l)
EUCAST (MIC, mg/l)
S I R S I R
Gram-negative
Acinetobacter spp. ≤8 16 ≥32 IU
Burkholderia cepacia NA IU
Enterobacteriaceae* ≤8 16 ≥32 ≤1 2-8 ≥16
Haemophilus spp. ≤2 ≤0.25 ≥0.5
Moraxella catarrhalis NA ≤0.25 ≥0.5
Neisseria gonorrhoeae ≤0.5 IU
Neisseria meningitidis NA IU
Pseudomonas spp. ≤8 16 ≥32 ≤8 ≥16
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia NA IU
Gram-positive
Enterococcus spp. NA IU
Staphylococcus spp. ≤8 16 ≥32
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Nonmeningitis ≤1 2 ≥4 ≤1 2 ≥4
Meningitis ≤0.5 1 ≥2
Streptococcus spp.
β-hemolytic group ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≥1
Viridans group ≤1 2 ≥4 ≤0.5 ≥1
*

According to CLSI criteria, confirmed E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and P. mirabilis ESBL producers should be reported as resistant to all cephalosporins and aztreonam independently of MIC values [28]. Notably, criteria for the remaining Enterobacteriaceae have not been established.

Susceptibility to cefepime, as with other cephalosporins, is inferred from the methicillin susceptibility.

CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; EUCAST: European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; I: Intermediate; IU: Inappropriate use; NA: Not available; R: Resistant; S: Susceptible.