Table 2. Positivity rate (%) by screening strategy and difference with the reference strategya.
|
Positivity rate × 100 screened subjects
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
2–day strategy
|
|||
| Cutoff | 1-day strategy | (at least one sample with positive result) | (both samples with positive results) |
| ⩾80 ng ml−1 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 2.8 |
| +0.9 (0.5–1.4) | +3.5 (3.0–3.9) | −1.7 (−2.1 to −1.4) | |
| ⩾100 ng ml−1 | 4.5a | 6.7 | 2.3 |
| (reference) | +2.2 (1.7–2.6) | −2.2 (−2.6 to −1.9) | |
| ⩾120 ng ml−1 | 4.0b | 5.9 | 2.0 |
| −0.5 (−0.9 to −0.1) | +1.4 (1.0–1.8) | −2.5 (−2.8 to −2.2) | |
Statistical comparison of strategies (with Bonferroni correction for multitesting).
95% CI (confidence interval) of difference is given in brackets.
All differences among each strategy and the reference strategy were statistically significant at P<0.00625 (threshold for significance after Bonferroni correction), except strategy of 1-day and cutoff ⩾120 ng ml−1.
Reference strategy: 1-day and cutoff ⩾100 ng ml−1.
P=0.0113.