Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 13;100(2):259–265. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604864

Table 2. Positivity rate (%) by screening strategy and difference with the reference strategya.

  Positivity rate × 100 screened subjects
    2–day strategy
Cutoff 1-day strategy (at least one sample with positive result) (both samples with positive results)
⩾80 ng ml−1 5.5 8.0 2.8
  +0.9 (0.5–1.4) +3.5 (3.0–3.9) −1.7 (−2.1 to −1.4)
⩾100 ng ml−1 4.5a 6.7 2.3
  (reference) +2.2 (1.7–2.6) −2.2 (−2.6 to −1.9)
⩾120 ng ml−1 4.0b 5.9 2.0
  −0.5 (−0.9 to −0.1) +1.4 (1.0–1.8) −2.5 (−2.8 to −2.2)

Statistical comparison of strategies (with Bonferroni correction for multitesting).

95% CI (confidence interval) of difference is given in brackets.

All differences among each strategy and the reference strategy were statistically significant at P<0.00625 (threshold for significance after Bonferroni correction), except strategy of 1-day and cutoff ⩾120 ng ml−1.

a

Reference strategy: 1-day and cutoff ⩾100 ng ml−1.

b

P=0.0113.