Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 13;100(2):259–265. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604864

Table 3. Detection rate (‰) for cancer and for significant neoplasiaa by screening strategy and difference with the reference strategyb.

  Detection rate × 1000 screened subjects
    2–day strategy
Cutoff 1-day strategy (at least one sample with positive result) (both samples with positive results)
Cancer
 ⩾80 ng ml−1 2.9 3.4 2.3
  +0.1 (−0.9 to 1.1) +0.6 (−0.5 to 1.7) −0.5 (−1.5 to 0.5)
 ⩾100 ng ml−1 2.8b 3.4 2.1
  (reference) +0.6 (−0.5 to 1.7) −0.6 (−1.6 to 0.3)
 ⩾120 ng ml−1 2.7 3.3 2.1
  −0.1 (−1.1 to 1.0) +0.5 (−0.6 to 1.5) −0.6 (−1.6 to 0.3)
       
Significant neoplasia
 ⩾80 ng ml−1 20.7 25.9c 14.6c
  +2.3 (−0.4 to 5.0) +7.5 (4.7–10.4) −3.8 (−6.3 to −1.3)
 ⩾100 ng ml−1 18.4b 23.1c 12.8c
  (reference) +4.7 (1.9–7.4) −5.6 (−8.0 to −3.2)
 ⩾120 ng ml−1 17.3 21.7d 12.1c
  −1.1 (−3.6 to 1.5) +3.3 (0.6–6.0) −6.3 (−8.6 to −3.9)

Statistical comparison of strategies (with Bonferroni correction for multitesting).

95% CI (confidence interval) of difference is given in brackets.

a

Significant neoplasia: cancer+advanced adenoma (any adenoma larger than 9 mm, and/or with a villous histological component higher than 20%, and/or with severe dysplasia).

b

Reference strategy: 1-day and cutoff ⩾100 ng ml−1.

c

Differences among strategy and the reference strategy were statistically significant at P<0.00625 (threshold for significance after Bonferroni correction).

d

Non-significant at P<0.00625 (P=0.0168).