Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 18;28(2):156–166. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.263

Table 1.

Selected crystallographic data and statistics

  apo–LmrR LmrR–drug complexes
    H33342 Daunomycin
Data analysis
 Space group C2221 P43212 P212121
 Unit cell (Å)      
  a 46.6 34.9 35.4
  b 52.6 34.9 53.0
  c 174.9 197.0 147.1
 Resolution (Å) 35–2.0 65–2.2 70–2.2
Rmergea 0.04 (0.5)b 0.05 (0.206) 0.036 (0.273)
 Mean II 46.6 (2.0) 21.1 (4.8) 28.9 (3.8)
 Completeness (%) 100 (99.3) 99.8 (99.0) 96.0 (99.9)
 Unique reflections 15 006 6948 17 020
 Redundancy 6.7 (7.8) 3.9 (2.9) 3.0 (3.5)
       
Refinement statistics
 Resolution (Å) 23–2.0 50–2.2 50–2.2
Rwork/Rfreec 0.22/0.27 0.21/0.26 0.23/0.27
 No. of non-H atoms      
  Protein 1693 850 1834
  Ligand 34 38
  Waters 83 27 43
 Root mean square deviations in      
  Bond length (Å) 0.011 0.013 0.016
  Bond angles (deg) 1.4 0.9 0.7
 Average B-values (Å2)      
  Protein 15 21 23
  Ligand 34 73
 Ramachandran analysis      
  Most favoured (%) 99.0 98.0 98.0
  Additional allowed (%) 1.0 2.0 2.0
aRmerge=ΣΣ∣IhklIhkl(j)∣/ΣΣIhkl, where Ihkl(j) is the observed intensity and Ihkl is the final average intensity value.
bValues in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
cRwork=Σ∣∣Fobs∣−∣Fcalc∣∣/Σ∣Fobs∣ and Rfree=Σ∣∣Fobs∣−∣Fcalc∣∣/Σ∣Fobs∣, where all reflections belong to a test set of 10% randomly selected data.