Table 4.
Groups (N) | Final body weight per mouse (g) | Omental fat weight/final body weight per mouse (mg/g) | Retroperitoneal fat weight/body weight per mouse (mg/g) | Tumor incidence | No. of tumor per mouse | No. of tumor per tumor-bearing/mouse | Average tumor dimensionb per tumor (mm) |
Control (22) | 49.9 ± 1.7 | 32.7 ± 3.6 | 10.6 ± 1.2 | 10/22 (46%) | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 2.7 ± 0.03 |
Exercise (17) | 43.0 ± 1.2* | 12.4 ± 2.6** | 4.2 ± 1.0** | 9/17 (53%) | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.2* | 2.9 ± 0.07 |
aResults of Experiment 3. The mice were maintained on a high-fat diet and housed in regular cages or cages equipped with a running wheel for 16 weeks. Values are mean ± SE of the number of samples (N) analyzed.
bAverage of length, width, and height of each tumor. There was no difference in the average volume of tumors (mm3) calculated using the formula V = 4/3πr3 (r :the average dimention/2) between the two groups.
**p < 0.05 by two-tailed t-test. *p = 0.06 by two-tailed t-test and p = 0.03 by one-tailed t-test. Values with no superscript did not differ from the values of the control group statistically (p > 0.05)