Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr;85(4):264–272. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.031195

Table 1. Socioeconomic characteristics of women who were screened or were not screened for cervical cancer, Maharashtra, India, October 1999–November 2003.

Characteristics Womena
Screened Not screened
Total 79 449 21 351
No. of people in household
1–2 3 612 (4.5) 1 774 (8.3)
3–4 16 444 (20.7) 4 222 (19.8)
≥5 59 391 (74.8) 15 355 (71.9)
Type of house
Thatched 22 433 (28.3) 6 198 (29.1)
Tiled 49 027 (61.8) 12 747 (59.8)
Concrete 7 862 (9.9) 2 388 (11.2)
Age group (years)
30–39 45 098 (56.8) 10 102 (47.3)
40–49 22 152 (27.9) 6 093 (28.5)
≥50 12 199 (15.4) 5 156 (24.1)
Educational level
None 54 708 (69.1) 13 956 (79.4)
Primary school 9 232 (11.7) 1 482 (8.4)
Secondary school 9 502 (12.0) 1 323 (7.5)
Higher education 5 711 (7.2) 808 (4.6)
Marital status
Married 72 417 (91.5) 14 980 (85.6)
Unmarried 6 703 (8.5) 2 523 (14.4)
Parity (no. of pregnancies)
0 1 797 (2.3) 4 723 (22.3)
1–3 29 392 (37.0) 5 769 (27.2)
≥4 48 260 (60.7) 10 679 (50.4)
Contraception used
No 16 548 (21.0) 5 945 (34.5)
Yes 62 181 (79.0) 11 278 (65.5)
Study arm
Visual inspection with acetic acid 26 755 (33.7) 7 394 (34.6)
Cytology 25 535 (32.1) 6 601 (30.9)
Human papillomavirus testing 27 159 (34.2) 7 356 (34.5)

a Values are number (percentage).