Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr;85(4):289–296. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.032441

Table 1. Access to individual and cumulative resources necessary for safe replacement feeding versus antenatal feeding intention.

Maternal 
HIV status Antenatal feeding intention N Resources available
Cumulative number of resources availablea
Safe water
Fridge
Electricity, gas or paraffin
Mother is main source of income
None
1
2
3
4
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
HIV positive(n = 1253) Exclusive 
breastfeeding 911 621b
(68%) 390
(42.8%) 646
(70.9%) 83a
(9.1%) 109
(12%) 199
(22%) 277
(30%) 307
(34%) 19c
(2%)
Replacement 
feeding 113 92
(81%) 59
(52.2%) 90
(79.6%) 23
(20.3%) 3
(2%) 18
(16%) 39
(35%) 44
(39%) 9
(8%)
Mixed feed 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Undecided 228 149
(65%) 105
(46%) 158
(69%) 34
(15%) 26
(11%) 49
(21%) 71
(31%) 71
(31%) 11
(4%)
HIV negatived(n = 1238) Exclusive 
breastfeeding 1021 719
(70.4%) 573
(56%) 669
(65.5%) 55
(5.3%) 130
(12%) 232
(23%) 338
(33%) 303
(30%) 18
(2%)
Replacement 
feeding 21 15
(71.4%) 13
(61.9%) 14
(66.6%) 3
(14.2%) 1
(5%) 6
(28%) 9
(43%) 4
(19%) 1
(5%)
Mixed feed 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 0
Undecided 193 120
(62%) 99
(51%) 129
(67%) 16
(8%) 18
(9%) 53
(27%) 62
(32%) 58
(30%) 2
(1%)

a Any combination of safe water, access to fridge/freezer, fuel other than wood and mother has regular income.
b P-value < 0.01 when comparing antenatal feeding intentions of exclusively breastfeeding, replacement feeding and undecided for resources available among HIV-positive women.
c P-value < 0.01 when comparing antenatal feeding intentions of exclusively breastfeeding, replacement feeding and undecided for cumulative resources available among HIV-positive women.
d All P-values > 0.5 when comparing antenatal feeding intentions of exclusive breastfeeding, replacement feeding and undecided for each individual resource and cumulative resources available among HIV-negative women.