Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr;85(4):289–296. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.032441

Table 2. Antenatal feeding intention versus actual practice in the first week of life.

HIV status Antenatal feeding intentiona Exclusive breastfeeding
Replacement feeding
Mixed feed
Some missing data
Switched from breastfeeding to replacement feeding
Switched from replacement feeding to breastfeeding
N (%)b N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
HIV positive(n = 1253) Exclusive breastfeeding
(n = 911) 707
(78%) 33
(3.6%) 98
(10.7%) 59
(6.5%) 11
(1%) 3
Replacement feeding
(n = 113) 35
(3%) 47
(41%) 14
(12%) 12c
(10%) 4 1
Mixed feed
(n = 1) 0 0 0 1 0 0
Undecided
(n = 228) 121
(53%) 21
(9%) 57
(25%) 25
(11%) 2 2
HIV negative(n = 1238) Exclusive breastfeeding
(n = 1021) 765
(75%) 5
(0.5%) 142
(4%) 106
(10%) 1 2
Replacement feeding
(n = 21) 8
(38%) 1
(5%) 5
(24%) 4
(19%) 2
(9%) 1
(5%)
Mixed feed
(n = 3) 1 0 2 0 0 0
Undecided
(n = 193) 128
(66%) 5
(2.5%) 34
(18%) 24
(12.5%) 2
(1%) 0

a P = 0.001 comparing antenatal feeding intentions of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women.
b P = 0.001 comparing women who intended to exclusively breastfeed and adhered to this postnatally between HIV-positive and HIV-negative women.
c Including 1 baby on intravenous fluids.