Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct;98(10):1886–1893. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129320

TABLE 3.

Adjusted Odds Ratios (ORs) for Overall Progression to Established Smoking and Transition From Nonsmoking to Experimentation Among Youths Living With a Smoker and Those Living With Nonsmokers: Massachusetts, 2001–2006

Overall Progression to Established Smokinga
Transition From Nonsmoking to Experimentationb
Lived With Smoker, OR (95% CI) Lived With Nonsmokers, OR (95% CI) Lived With Smoker, OR (95% CI) Lived With Nonsmokers, OR (95% CI)
Main predictor variable (level 1)
Presence of a complete smoking ban in household
 Yes (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 No 1.38 (0.92, 2.07) 1.08 (0.61, 1.93) 0.99 (0.73, 1.37) 1.89* (1.30, 2.74)
Individual-level time-varying covariates (level 1)
Age group, y
 12–14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 15–17 0.83 (0.52, 1.31) 1.72** (1.11, 2.65) 0.93 (0.86, 1.02) 2.20* (1.65, 2.93)
 18–21 0.69 (0.32, 1.49) 0.86 (0.44, 1.67) 0.98 (0.35, 2.71) 1.22 (0.69, 2.17)
Baseline smoking status
 Nonsusceptible never smoker 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Susceptible never smoker 1.43 (0.72, 2.85) 1.96** (1.10, 3.48) 0.92 (0.64, 1.30) 1.24 (0.93, 1.67)
 Puffed 5.51* (2.71, 11.20) 4.95* (2.27, 10.82)
 Smoked whole cigarette 12.95* (6.03, 27.77) 19.41* (9.92, 37.99)
 Smoked in past 30 d 43.14* (17.35, 107.3) 49.08* (23.20, 103.8)
Presence of close friend who smokes
 No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Yes 1.90* (1.27, 2.84) 2.34* (1.08, 2.52) 1.93* (1.38, 2.70) 2.26* (1.64, 3.12)
4-y follow-up period (wave 1 to wave 3)
 No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Yes 3.78* (1.81, 7.85) 4.17* (1.28, 13.59) 1.89 (0.77, 4.65) 2.81* (1.39, 5.67)
Individual-level covariates (level 2)
Gender
 Boy (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Girl 0.72 (0.48, 1.09) 0.43* (0.29, 0.63) 0.90 (0.65, 1.26) 0.80 (0.63, 1.03)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Other 1.17 (0.62, 2.21) 1.24 (0.69, 2.25) 0.98 (0.61, 1.57) 0.80 (0.47, 1.36)
Household income, $
 ≤ 50 000 (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 > 50 000 0.81 (0.49, 1.31) 1.46 (0.82, 2.60) 1.14 (0.76, 1.72) 1.72** (1.10, 2.68)
Informant education
 Not college graduate (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 College graduate 0.79 (0.48, 1.32) 1.08 (0.69, 1.70) 1.18 (0.80, 1.72) 0.95 (0.69, 1.31)
Town-level covariates (level 3)c
Percentage “yes” vote on Question 1d 0.89 (0.68, 1.17) 1.24 (0.96, 1.59) 1.01 (0.83, 1.24) 1.09 (0.92, 1.30)
Percentage of residents who are White 1.31* (1.08, 1.58) 1.12 (0.88, 1.44) 1.15 (0.96, 1.36) 1.01 (0.88, 1.18)
Percentage of residents who are youths 0.77 (0.40, 1.46) 0.86 (0.53, 1.41) 0.79 (0.51, 1.24) 0.88 (0.65, 1.21)

Note. CI = confidence interval. Ellipses indicate not applicable.

a

Progression to established smoking is defined as having smoked 100 cigarettes in one's lifetime. Analyses on the basis of 858 individuals living in 229 towns, contributing a total of 1241 observations for youths living with smokers, and analyses on the basis of 1672 individuals living in 276 towns, contributing a total of 2538 observations for youths living without smokers.

b

Analyses on the basis of 731 individuals living in 211 towns, contributing a total of 1042 observations for youths living with smokers, and analyses on the basis of 1538 individuals living in 268 towns, contributing a total of 2315 observations for youths living without smokers.

c

Odds ratio associated with each 10-percentage-point increase in variable.

d

Question 1 was a 1992 ballot initiative that increased the cigarette tax and created a statewide tobacco control program.

*P < .01; **P < .05.