Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Oct 19;60(1):51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.08.040

Table II.

Relation between health provider density (by specialty) and the log-likelihood of dying from or being diagnosed with advanced stage malignant melanoma, controlling for Socioeconomic Status (SES), SEER-9 program, 1988–1993.

Advanced Stage of Melanoma at Diagnosis Death from Malignant Melanoma
Provider Density alone Log-odds (Standard Error) Controlling for SES** Log-odds (Standard Error) Provider Density alone Log-odds (Standard Error) Controlling for SES** Log-odds (Standard Error)
Dermatologists per 100,000 population −410 (200)* −160 (200) −660 (200)* −360 (200)
Family Practitioners per 100,000 population 63 (27)* 80 (30)* 70 (30)* 80 (30)*
Internists per 100,000 population 30 (21) 3 (20) 40 (20) 20 (20)
Likelihood Ratio χ2, df (p-value) 8.7, df 3 (p=0.03) 96.1, df 6 (p<0.0001) 20.1, df 3 (p=0.0002) 154.7, df 6 (p<0.0001)
*

P-value <0.05.

Density of dermatologists, family practitioners and internists examined in same model.

**

Density of providers examined in same model which controlled for the census tract median household income, proportion of the population white, and proportion with less than a high school education.

All Log-odds and standard errors × 10−4

Note: The dependent individual-level variables of Malignant Melanoma-specific death (yes/no) and Advanced stage of melanoma at diagnosis (lymph node or metastatic involvement vs. not) were analyzed as dichotomous variables using logistic regression (please refer to methods section for further detail).