Table 3.
Adjusted logistic regression for LAZ < -2.
| Adjusted LAZ < -2, total: 723 | LAZ < -2 OR | 95% CI | LAZ < -2 OR | 95% CI | LAZ < -2 OR | 95% CI | LAZ < -2 OR | 95% CI |
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 | |||||
| Inherent factors | ||||||||
| Gender of infant | 0.70 | 0.46–1.07 | 0.66 | 0.41–1.08 | 0.63 | 0.41–0.97c | 0.62 | 0.39–0.97c |
| Girl | 1.14 | 1.08–1.21a | 1.15 | 1.07–1.22a | 1.17 | 1.10–1.25a | 1.10 | 1.03–1.19b |
| Age constant (0–11 cont) | ||||||||
| Underlying factors | ||||||||
| Mean sub-county wealth | ||||||||
| Highest | 1.00 | |||||||
| Mid | 1.06 | 0.65–1.72 | ||||||
| Lowest | 1.64 | 1.00–2.71c | ||||||
| Distal factors | ||||||||
| Houshold wealth | ||||||||
| Top 20% | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| Mid 40% | 1.65 | 0.74–3.68 | 1.71 | 0.87–3.36 | 1.30 | 0.62–2.73 | ||
| Lowest 40% | 3.50 | 1.57–7.78b | 3.10 | 1.56–6.15a | 2.70 | 1.39–5.28b | ||
| Intermediate factors | ||||||||
| Infant has siblings | ||||||||
| Yes | 0.43 | 0.24–0.79b | 0.60 | 0.38–0.94c | ||||
| Proximal factors | ||||||||
| Mixed feeding/Replacement feeding | ||||||||
| Yes | 2.71 | 1.02–7.13c |
a p ≤ 0.001, b p ≤ 0.01, c p ≤ 0.05
Significant factors in addition to age and gender presented according to the hierarchical conceptual framework in figure 1.