Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Leukemia. 2008 Aug 7;22(11):2062–2069. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.197

Table 5.

Comparison of Parimon and present study data

Variable Parimon 2006 Present study
no (%) Score no (%) Univariable β (se) for OS Multivariable β (se) for OS Univariable β (se) for NRM Multivariable β (se) for NRM
No. patients 2802 286
Age, y
   <15 1 (0) NC 57 (20) −0.01 (0.30) 0.31 (0.31) 0.17 (0.35) 0.41 (0.38)
   15–50 2158 (77) 1 172 (60) 0 0 0 0
   50–60 545 (19) 3 52 (18) 0.32 (0.27) 0.61 (0.33) 0.45 (0.33) 0.54 (0.41)
   >60 98 (4) 5 5 (2) −0.24 (1.01) −0.16 (1.17) NC* NC*
Donor type
   Related, matched 1354 (48) 1 149 (52) 0 0 0 0
   Unrelated 1161 (42) 3 129 (45) 0.87 (0.23) 0.86 (0.24) 0.96 (0.29) 1.02 (0.31)
   Related, mismatched 285 (10) 4 8 (3) −0.05 (0.73) −0.35 (0.74) NC* NC*
Disease risk
   Low 781 (28) 1 38 (13) 0 0 0 0
   Intermediate 787 (28) 8 156 (55) 0.83 (0.43) 0.55 (0.48) 0.28 (0.45) −0.02 (0.52)
   High 1234 (44) 12 92 (32) 0.65 (0.45) 0.57 (0.53) 0.45 (0.47) 0.19 (0.56)
Conditioning regimen
   Nonmyeloablative 174 (6) 1 114 (40) 0 0 0 0
   Non-total-body-irradiation 927 (33) 4 108 (38) −0.09 (0.26) 0.28 (0.37) −0.34 (0.32) 0.05 (0.45)
   TBI with ≤ 12 Gy 726 (26) 8 64 (22) 0.25 (0.28) 0.44 (0.42) −0.08 (0.36) 0.37 (0.52)
   TBI with > 12 Gy 975 (35) 9 0 (0) NC* NC* NC* NC*
Serum creatinine level
   ≤ 1.2 mg/dL 2531 (90) 1 281 (98) 0 0 0 0
   > 1.2 mg/dL 271 (10) 8 5 (2) 0.34 (0.72) 0.46 (0.81) 0.80 (0.72) 1.23 (0.75)
Serum alanine aminotransferase level
   ≤ 49 U/L 2210 (79) 1 176 (62) 0 0 0 0
   > 49 U/L 592 (21) 2 110 (38) −0.18 (0.23) −0.23 (0.23) −0.23 (0.29) −0.22 (0.29)
FEV1
   > 80% 2293 (82) 1 86/97 (89) 0 NC* 0 NC*
   70%–80% 321 (11) 3 6/97 (6) 1.37 (0.63) NC* 1.77 (0.65) NC*
   ≤ 70% 188 (7) 6 5/97 (5) −0.02 (1.03) NC* 0.41 (1.05) NC*
DLCO
   ≥ 70% 2624 (94) 1 34/82 (41) 0 NC* 0 NC*
   < 70% 178 (6) 4 48/82 (59) 0.15 (0.49) NC* 0.31 (0.63) NC*
*

NC: not calculated because insufficient event number or data

Comparison of original PAM scores and 10 times β coefficient in our cohort allows to apprehend the discriminative value of each item in our cohort