Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb;4(2):261–272. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03780808

Table 3.

Jadad score calculation for quality assessment of included trials

Study (reference) Trial described as randomized Randomization method was described and appropriate Double blind Double blinding method described and appropriate Withdrawals and dropouts described Jadad score
Prevention trials
Akamatsu 2005 (21) Yes Yes No No Yes 3
Brenner 1995 (23) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5
Hayashi 2003 (24) Yes No No No Yes 2
Hayashida 2000 (25) Yes No No No Yes 2
Kurnik 1990 (27) Yes No Yes Yes Yes 4
Kurnik 1998 (28) Yes No Yes Yes Yes 4
Langrehr 1997 (30) Yes No No No Yes 2
Sezai 2000 (35) Yes No Yes Yes Yes 4
Sezai 2006 (36) Yes No Yes Yes Yes 4
Sezai 2006a (37) Yes No No No Yes 2
Sezai 2007 (38) Yes No No No Yes 2
Treatment trials
Allgren 1997 (22) 1 1 1 1 1 5
Herbert 1999 (26) 1 0 1 1 1 4
Kuse 1996 (29) 1 0 1 1 1 4
Lewis 2000 (31) 1 1 1 1 1 5
Meyer 1997 (32) 1 0 1 1 1 4
Meyer 1999 (33) 1 0 1 1 1 4
Rahman 1994 (34) 1 0 0 0 1 2
Sward 2004 (39) 1 1 1 1 1 5