Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb;4(2):291–298. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01840408

Table 5.

Effect of multivariate adjustment on the association between baseline creatinine clearance and rate of plaque growth

Model 1: Unadjusted (model P = 0.01, R2 = 0.065)
Creatinine clearance quintile Unadjusted β coefficient (95% CI) P = 0.01
    q1(<23 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.22 (−0.34 to −0.10)
    q2 (23 to 29 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.10 (−0.22 to 0.02)
    q3 (29 to 35 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.10 (−0.22 to 0.02)
    q4 (35 to 43 ml/min/1.73 m2) -0.07 (−0.19 to 0.05)
    q5 (>43 ml/min/1.73 m2) (ref.) 0.0
Model 2: Adjusted for baseline plaque and center (model P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.255)
Creatinine Clearance Quintile Unadjusted β Coefficient (95% CI) P = 0.01
    q1(<23 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.19 (−0.29,−0.08) P = 0.03
    q2 (23 to 29 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.09 (−0.19 to 0.02)
    q3 (29 to 35 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.07 (−0.18 to 0.03)
    q4 (35 to 43 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.06 (−0.16 to 0.04)
    q5 (>43 ml/min/1.73 m2) (ref.) 0.0
Model 3: Adjusted for center, baseline plaque, duration of follow-up, number of ultrasounds, age, gender, smoking status, diabetes, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, PTH, calcium binder use (model P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.296)
Creatinine Clearance Quintile Adjusted β Coefficients P = 0.02
    q1(<23 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.189 (−0.30, −0.08)
    q2 (23 to 29 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.10 (−0.21, 0.01)
    q3 (29 to 35 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.07 (−0.18, 0.03)
    q4 (35 to 43 ml/min/1.73 m2) −0.06 (−0.17, 0.04)
    q5 (>43 ml/min/1.73 m2) (ref.) 0.0