Table 2. Binding affinities (Kd, nM) of WT and redesigned CaM to selected targets.
| smMLCK | skMLCK | Spectrin | Melittin | Peptide1 | CaMKI | CaMKII | CaMKK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaMwt | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 3.3 ± 0.8 | 3.3 ± 1.5 | 28 ± 5 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 1.0 ± 3.0 |
| CaMcore | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 4.9 ± 1.2 | 16 ± 6.0 | 54 ± 18 | 147 ± 48 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 54 ± 20 | 32 ± 13 |
| Decrease in binding* | 0.72 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 86 | 0.76 | 11 | 32 |
| Specificity increase† | 1.0 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.6 | 120 | 1.1 | 15 | 44 |
| CaMmodboundarybias | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 21 ± 3 | 11 ± 2 | 33 ± 6 | 343 ± 66 | 7 ± 2 | 27 ± 6 | 67 ± 28 |
| Decrease in binding* | 1.3 | 6.4 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 202 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 67 |
| Specificity increase† | 1.0 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 155 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 51 |
Decrease in binding was calculated by taking the ratio of binding affinities of a CaM variant and CaMwt for a particular target
Specificity increase was calculated by taking the ratio of binding affinity of a CaM variant and CaMwt for a particular target and dividing it by the same ratio for smMLCK