Skip to main content
. 2003 Nov 3;100(23):13274–13279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2234277100

Table 2. Binding affinities (Kd, nM) of WT and redesigned CaM to selected targets.

smMLCK skMLCK Spectrin Melittin Peptide1 CaMKI CaMKII CaMKK
CaMwt 1.8 ± 1.3 3.3 ± 0.8 3.3 ± 1.5 28 ± 5 1.7 ± 0.8 1.7 ± 0.7 5.1 ± 1.5 1.0 ± 3.0
CaMcore 1.3 ± 0.9 4.9 ± 1.2 16 ± 6.0 54 ± 18 147 ± 48 1.3 ± 0.8 54 ± 20 32 ± 13
   Decrease in binding* 0.72 1.5 4.8 1.9 86 0.76 11 32
   Specificity increase 1.0 2.1 6.7 2.6 120 1.1 15 44
CaMmodboundarybias 2.3 ± 0.7 21 ± 3 11 ± 2 33 ± 6 343 ± 66 7 ± 2 27 ± 6 67 ± 28
   Decrease in binding* 1.3 6.4 3.3 1.2 202 4.1 5.3 67
   Specificity increase 1.0 4.9 2.6 0.9 155 3.2 4.1 51
*

Decrease in binding was calculated by taking the ratio of binding affinities of a CaM variant and CaMwt for a particular target

Specificity increase was calculated by taking the ratio of binding affinity of a CaM variant and CaMwt for a particular target and dividing it by the same ratio for smMLCK