Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar;50(3):412–423. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800383-JLR200

TABLE 5.

Relative amounts of mRNAs in livers from wild-type and Elovl5−/− mice on diets supplemented with unsaturated fatty acids

Diets Chow 0.2% Arachidonic + 0.05% DHA
Elovl5 genotype +/+ −/− +/+ −/−
SREBP pathway
 SREBP-1c 1.0 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.2
 SREBP-1a 1.0 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.0
 SREBP-2 1.0 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1
 Insig-1 1.0 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1
 Insig-2 1.0 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1a 0.9 ± 0.0 1.0 ± 0.0
Fatty acid synthesis
 ACC-1 1.0 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.4a 0.8 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1
 FAS 1.0 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.4a 0.5 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.2
 SCD-1 1.0 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.8a 0.6 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.1
 G6PD 1.0 ± 0.2 7.8 ± 1.4a 0.7 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.2
 Malic enzyme 1.0 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.3a 0.5 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.2
 ELOVL2 1.0 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.1a 0.6 ± 0.0a 0.8 ± 0.1
 ELOVL6 1.0 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2a 0.5 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.2
 Δ6 desaturase 1.0 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.3a 0.8 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1
 Δ5 desaturase 1.0 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.2a 0.8 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1

Total RNA from each liver of five mice used in Table 4 was subjected to quantitative real-time PCR as described in Experimental Procedures. Values represent the mean ± SE amount of mRNA from five mice relative to that of wild-type mice fed chow, which is defined as 1. Cyclophilin was used as the invariant control.

a

Levels statistically different than wild-type mice fed chow (P < 0.05, Student's t-test).