Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2008 Jan;48(1):80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.015

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Average proportion of correct responses as a function of target eccentricity and cue type (peripheral cue vs. neutral cue) in Experiment 2. Precueing the target location with a peripheral cue (filled circles, continuous line) improved performance in the periphery, but impaired performance at more central locations. Error bars are indicated in the lower right of the graph and represent ± 1 SEM per cueing condition, averaged across eccentricities.