Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 12;9(Suppl 12):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S12-S3

Table 4.

Results of the performance analyses of ProMirII-g and miR-abela using human, mouse and rat genome data.

Software Statistics Human Mouse (All) Mouse (Distinct) Rat
ProMirII-g # of predictions 690 656 640 615

# of TPs 215 199 183 127

# of FPs 475 457 457 485

# of real miRNAs missed 25 46 29 19

SE 89.58% 81.22% 85.92% 86.99%

PPV 31.16% 30.34% 28.59% 20.65%

miR-abela # of predictions 1036 915 901 646

# of TPs 149 140 126 86

# of FPs 887 775 775 560

# of real miRNAs missed 91 105 86 60

SE 62.08% 57.14% 59.43% 58.90%

PPV 14.38% 15.30% 13.98% 13.31%

It should be noted that in the mouse genome, 25 of the pre-miRNAs are duplicated. In other words, only 212 mouse pre-miRNAs are distinct in the genome. To avoid overestimation of the performance of the software, we identify the duplicated ones and conduct two measurements. #, number; FP, false positives; TP, true positives; SE, sensitivity; PPV, positive predictive value.